No nancy

bucksducks

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
141
Reaction score
8
Looks like the only proposal from nancys gang that passed is the oldsquaw proposal for 1 a day 2 in possession
 

kwackkillncrew

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
1,846
Reaction score
248
Location
chugiak, ak
That's great. I kinda did like the sea duck harvest proposal. I dont think it would be a bad idea to have to report the number of sea ducks getting shot. I am all for tighter regs if it is science based and necessary but lowering limits based on emotions is never a.good idea
 

Chez

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
82
Location
Soldotna
These days all science IS emotionally biased and cannot be trusted
 

kwackkillncrew

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
1,846
Reaction score
248
Location
chugiak, ak
Ok sure. But actually having waterfowl biologists complete a study and report is more scientific then a couple of people saying they would rather not have people hunting in "their" bay because they dont like hunters and duck hunters are destroying the populations in kbay. And spewing doom and gloom. Just watch or listen to the kbay public advisory committee meetings. It's disgusting
 

bucksducks

Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2009
Messages
141
Reaction score
8
I’m against anything she is for, unfortunately that’s the situation. She is for shutting down duck hunting in Kbay but didn’t win this time!
 

Chez

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 28, 2013
Messages
1,025
Reaction score
82
Location
Soldotna
Ok sure. But actually having waterfowl biologists complete a study and report is more scientific then a couple of people saying they would rather not have people hunting in "their" bay because they dont like hunters and duck hunters are destroying the populations in kbay. And spewing doom and gloom. Just watch or listen to the kbay public advisory committee meetings. It's disgusting
Biologist work for state or feds which means they will adjust the studies to reflect whatever the state or feds would like to see
 

68 Bronco

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 1, 2007
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
173
No need to wonder because : "These days all science IS emotionally biased and cannot be trusted"
We are so blessed to be presented this unearthed truth from a remarkable source that 'all science IS.....', which reads absolutely ALL !! I suddenly feel relieved of a lifelong burdensome question. /s
 

kwackkillncrew

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2010
Messages
1,846
Reaction score
248
Location
chugiak, ak
I appreciate all the science info but I didnt think local scientist would infiltrate the waterfowl forum. Dont want this to turn into the typical fisheries debate that happens in the other areas.
 
Top