No nancy

[bucksducks]

Looks like the only proposal from nancys gang that passed is the oldsquaw proposal for 1 a day 2 in possession

 

[kwackkillncrew]

That's great. I kinda did like the sea duck harvest proposal. I dont think it would be a bad idea to have to report the number of sea ducks getting shot. I am all for tighter regs if it is science based and necessary but lowering limits based on emotions is never a.good idea

 

[Chez]

These days all science IS emotionally biased and cannot be trusted

 

[kwackkillncrew]

Ok sure. But actually having waterfowl biologists complete a study and report is more scientific then a couple of people saying they would rather not have people hunting in "their" bay because they dont like hunters and duck hunters are destroying the populations in kbay. And spewing doom and gloom. Just watch or listen to the kbay public advisory committee meetings. It's disgusting

 

[bucksducks]

I’m against anything she is for, unfortunately that’s the situation. She is for shutting down duck hunting in Kbay but didn’t win this time!

 

[Chez]

Ok sure. But actually having waterfowl biologists complete a study and report is more scientific then a couple of people saying they would rather not have people hunting in "their" bay because they dont like hunters and duck hunters are destroying the populations in kbay. And spewing doom and gloom. Just watch or listen to the kbay public advisory committee meetings. It's disgusting

Biologist work for state or feds which means they will adjust the studies to reflect whatever the state or feds would like to see

 

[kwackkillncrew]

Cool. So can I only trust you and your science then

 

[Doug in Alaska]

I was wondering the same thing.

 

[68 Bronco]

No need to wonder because : "These days all science IS emotionally biased and cannot be trusted"
We are so blessed to be presented this unearthed truth from a remarkable source that 'all science IS.....', which reads absolutely ALL !! I suddenly feel relieved of a lifelong burdensome question. /s

 

[4merguide]

I will continue to trust science as long as the scientists allow their science to be mutually questioned by other scientists. Believe it or not I still believe there are scientists that still believe in the actual design of true science.

 

[kwackkillncrew]

I appreciate all the science info but I didnt think local scientist would infiltrate the waterfowl forum. Dont want this to turn into the typical fisheries debate that happens in the other areas.

 

[Chez]

Cool. So can I only trust you and your science then

I'm never wrong so yeah

QUESTION every scientist, if they dont like that or call names than they are lying