Neat "new" Ruger No. 1

tvfinak

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
113
Location
welfare state of Alaska
I was a gun show down south a couple of weeks ago and stumbled across an early Ruger No. with a 3 digit serial no: 8xx. It was chambered for the .222 Rem cartridge and has the lightweight 22" barrel- a kind of neat configuration. Unfortunately I didn't get the early vertically split rings- I've got to find a set somewhere.

The workmanship - fit and finish - on these early No. 1 is really superb. From what I've heard they fitted the wood to the unfinished metal and then finished the wood and metal and put them back together again.

Anyone else experienced with and/or fans of these early No. 1rifles?
 

sh

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
763
Reaction score
13
No but you got a nice one sounds like.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

7STW

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
210
Reaction score
7
Yes, I had a #1 in 22-250 which I bought in 1977.

Not to rain on your parade, but I was never impressed with this rifle.It was a mediocre shooter...the trigger couldn't be adjusted to achieve a decent pull...and a poorly installed quarter rib never allowed a Leupold scope to be zeroed without shimming the rings.

Once I picked up a 40X KS in 22-250, the #1 went down the river quickly.
 

tvfinak

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
113
Location
welfare state of Alaska
just a quality neat gun

just a quality neat gun

I haven't shot this one yet and I really don't expect it to be a tack driver- although it may be. I have other guns to tackle shots that require precise accuracy.

But the configuration and feel of the single shot and the quality of the workmanship including finish are what are attractive to me. I would have to pay much much more to get the quality of this rifle in another form.


Yes, I had a #1 in 22-250 which I bought in 1977.

Not to rain on your parade, but I was never impressed with this rifle.It was a mediocre shooter...the trigger couldn't be adjusted to achieve a decent pull...and a poorly installed quarter rib never allowed a Leupold scope to be zeroed without shimming the rings.

Once I picked up a 40X KS in 22-250, the #1 went down the river quickly.
 

.338 mag.

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
3,096
Reaction score
109
I also read Bill Ruger had good wood and extra attention to fit and finish as well as Douglas barrels on some of the early Ruger No. 1 rifles. I hope to get one in .308 Win. some day.
 

7STW

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
210
Reaction score
7
No doubt, the aesthetics of the #1 are very attractive for the price.

But I want my rifles to perform.For me, performance is always the top consideration.Pretty is as pretty does.

This early #1 was a looker...but had an advanced case of BO LOL.
 

Eastwoods

New member
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
434
Reaction score
3
Location
Southern Tier, New York
I've looked for one in 45-70....actually found many.....but, haven't pulled the trigger b/c I want to feel like I'm getting a deal, and want one with wood of my taste/fancy. I love looking though. The 45-70's are built on the medium frame, hence, about 7 1/2 lbs. Although, I think the older ones may be the heavier Tropical model.
 

Armymark

New member
Joined
Apr 28, 2009
Messages
607
Reaction score
27
Location
Anchorage, AK
Yes, I had a #1 in 22-250 which I bought in 1977.

Not to rain on your parade, but I was never impressed with this rifle.It was a mediocre shooter...the trigger couldn't be adjusted to achieve a decent pull...and a poorly installed quarter rib never allowed a Leupold scope to be zeroed without shimming the rings.

Once I picked up a 40X KS in 22-250, the #1 went down the river quickly.

i have a few No. 1s and all shoot Moa but, I have one from the 70s in 6mm Rem. I shot that thing and experimented with a lot of different bullets and was about to give up on it. Then I tried one more bullet and started working up and it shot like crap for the first few loads working up then suddenly, the next load it went to a 5 shot half inch group and it will still shoot that load.! Talk about finicky.
 

tvfinak

New member
Joined
Jan 8, 2007
Messages
5,186
Reaction score
113
Location
welfare state of Alaska
finally found a set..

finally found a set..

It took a year and a half but I finally found a set of the vertically split rings for my Ruger! Price was not for the faint of heart, but you gotta pay what you gotta pay.

I've got an old Redfield 12X of the period I may put on it; when I get it together I'll post a picture or two.



I was a gun show down south a couple of weeks ago and stumbled across an early Ruger No. with a 3 digit serial no: 8xx. It was chambered for the .222 Rem cartridge and has the lightweight 22" barrel- a kind of neat configuration. Unfortunately I didn't get the early vertically split rings- I've got to find a set somewhere.

The workmanship - fit and finish - on these early No. 1 is really superb. From what I've heard they fitted the wood to the unfinished metal and then finished the wood and metal and put them back together again.

Anyone else experienced with and/or fans of these early No. 1rifles?
 

elmerkeithclone

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
4,171
Reaction score
131
I have always loved the 222. You can load them down a bit with Blue Dot and have the nicest squirrel hunting rig around.

I have never seen a 222 that didn't have a sweet spot.
 
Top