This is a post from a forum in Oregon. In case you guys in Alaska are not aware of it you are on the list also. So I would suggest that you respond to the BS as have other states hunting organizations have. Georgia is the only state that has caved in to the BS lawsuit.
How do you guys feel about some fellow from Missouri telling you how you you should hunt? aye!!??
I'd email the dude and tell him to stick to MKissouri and mind his own business. AZs we here in Oregon have done.
Backcountry Hunters and Anglers told the guy to stick [email protected]!!!
Below is a post from ifish.net:
Warning: This is a rant and a call to action for those who are so inclined.
HPML is High Performance Muzzleloading, and if you haven't heard of them, you're not alone. It seems to be an online magazine/lobbying organization funded by Knight Rifles. They've filed a complaint against ODFW and 14 other state game agencies claiming that regulations prohibiting the use of scopes during muzzleloader-only seasons violate the civil rights of hunters with poor eyesight. The goal of the complaint is to get the Interior Department to withhold funding for these state game agencies until they allow scopes during muzzleloader seasons.
They've got a page about this on their web site here.
What bothers me the most about this, aside from the bogus "civil rights" aspect of the complaint, is that this group has absolutely no representation among Oregon hunters. They ran a survey on their web site asking for input on their site and they got zero responses from Oregon. Not only that, but the Oregon muzzleloader regulations have been designed to represent the views of Oregon muzzleloader hunters as the result of a survey taken in 1999. In that survey 79% of the respondents (all of them Oregon muzzleloader hunters) said that scopes should be illegal.
I just talked to a guy at ODFW and he said they're aware of the complaint, but that there's nothing they can do until the Dept. of Interior issues a ruling. He said that if scopes are allowed, it will probably result in fewer tags being issued to make up for the increased harvest that would result. This really [whoopsydaisies!] me off, and if it does you too, you can make your feelings known by writing a polite email to the guy (who's from Missouri, by the way) who is pushing this whole thing. He replied to the email I sent him yesterday by saying that he was going to see this through and that I would just "have to get used to it." I don't think I will "get used to it." His email is [email protected]
I'm done ranting now. Thanks for reading this far.
Yep. Here's their hit list, although Georgia has apparently already given in.
ALASKA
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
GEORGIA
IDAHO
KANSAS
MINNESOTA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NORTH DAKOTA
OREGON
SOUTH DAKOTA
UTAH
WASHINGTON
WISCONSIN
How do you guys feel about some fellow from Missouri telling you how you you should hunt? aye!!??
I'd email the dude and tell him to stick to MKissouri and mind his own business. AZs we here in Oregon have done.
Backcountry Hunters and Anglers told the guy to stick [email protected]!!!
Below is a post from ifish.net:
Warning: This is a rant and a call to action for those who are so inclined.
HPML is High Performance Muzzleloading, and if you haven't heard of them, you're not alone. It seems to be an online magazine/lobbying organization funded by Knight Rifles. They've filed a complaint against ODFW and 14 other state game agencies claiming that regulations prohibiting the use of scopes during muzzleloader-only seasons violate the civil rights of hunters with poor eyesight. The goal of the complaint is to get the Interior Department to withhold funding for these state game agencies until they allow scopes during muzzleloader seasons.
They've got a page about this on their web site here.
What bothers me the most about this, aside from the bogus "civil rights" aspect of the complaint, is that this group has absolutely no representation among Oregon hunters. They ran a survey on their web site asking for input on their site and they got zero responses from Oregon. Not only that, but the Oregon muzzleloader regulations have been designed to represent the views of Oregon muzzleloader hunters as the result of a survey taken in 1999. In that survey 79% of the respondents (all of them Oregon muzzleloader hunters) said that scopes should be illegal.
I just talked to a guy at ODFW and he said they're aware of the complaint, but that there's nothing they can do until the Dept. of Interior issues a ruling. He said that if scopes are allowed, it will probably result in fewer tags being issued to make up for the increased harvest that would result. This really [whoopsydaisies!] me off, and if it does you too, you can make your feelings known by writing a polite email to the guy (who's from Missouri, by the way) who is pushing this whole thing. He replied to the email I sent him yesterday by saying that he was going to see this through and that I would just "have to get used to it." I don't think I will "get used to it." His email is [email protected]
I'm done ranting now. Thanks for reading this far.
Yep. Here's their hit list, although Georgia has apparently already given in.
ALASKA
CALIFORNIA
COLORADO
GEORGIA
IDAHO
KANSAS
MINNESOTA
NEBRASKA
NEVADA
NORTH DAKOTA
OREGON
SOUTH DAKOTA
UTAH
WASHINGTON
WISCONSIN