I'm going to let you guys in on a little secret.
I highly doubt any of the state fish biologists are going to read what I post and say, "you know, that anonymous goof-ball guy on the internet may be on to something".
It's the internet guys, everybody is entitled to voice their opinion, even me.
The reasoning is listed in the latest fishing report. Little Su will not be opened back up, as of yet, because the goal is based on aerial surveys with a certain margin of error, and the weir is an exact count.racer:
You are correct! Fish biologists across the country actually avoid these type of sites because of the crazy stuff that people post.
I know of one site that approached the Game and Fish fisheries biologists to see if they would be willing to answer questions posted on the site. A couple biologists in the state agreed and for a while were diligent about answering questions. But, after a few months of dealing with the crap and conspiracies, etc. they had enough and for the most part have quit participating. People posting on the site were actually arguing with the fish biologists and calling them liars about how many fish were stocked and what size they were at the time of stocking when the biologists were the ones that stocked the fish!! All because these people had gone to the water and could not catch a fish!!
I will say this site has a higher percentage of more informed anglers than the site I am talking about has.