Hunting on the States Dime

woundedknee

New member
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
274
Reaction score
15
Wanted to know what you all thought about a Fish and Game employee working at check station "Ella's cabin" and hunting on the states time? Something smells fishy to me. What say you? Should this be reported?
 

Yukon Cornelius

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
1,531
Reaction score
40
Location
Alaska
Wanted to know what you all thought about a Fish and Game employee working at check station "Ella's cabin" and hunting on the states time? Something smells fishy to me. What say you? Should this be reported?
Is this an hourly or salaried employee?
Are they performing their duties?
Would this similar to an employee surfing the internet on company time?
 

acg515

New member
Joined
Aug 8, 2014
Messages
326
Reaction score
16
Location
Alaska
I don't see anything wrong with it as long as they perform their duties as employees of the Fish and Game. Just because you have an employer who puts you up in a cabin doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to hunt? Do your work and then hunt on your off time.

Does it?
 

woundedknee

New member
Joined
Feb 14, 2007
Messages
274
Reaction score
15
Don't know for sure on whether they are salaried or not. I forgot, use of the F&G boat to go hunt and got flown out there on the states dime. Basically a paid hunt trip.

Is this an hourly or salaried employee?
Are they performing their duties?
Would this similar to an employee surfing the internet on company time?
 

anchskier

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 27, 2007
Messages
3,156
Reaction score
265
Don't know for sure on whether they are salaried or not. I forgot, use of the F&G boat to go hunt and got flown out there on the states dime. Basically a paid hunt trip.

Do you think that people who have to travel to remote locations for work should not be allowed to hunt or fish while there because they were flown there by their employer and didn't pay their own way? You haven't provided much in the way of details about this situation. You say it was a "paid hunt trip".... Why were they out there? Were they performing a work duty at the location and hunting in their extra free time? You make it sound like they were hunting the entire time while there.

If they were flown out there by their employer and all they did was hunt and/or fish and didn't do some other work function, then I would say it isn't appropriate. If they were doing those other activities in addition to the work they were sent out there to do, then I would say it is no problem. The issue about use of State property for the activity could still be an issue though, but there may be some allowance depending on the situation. There may be a mechanism in place for the user to pay for the use of the equipment, but I don't know.
 

Birdstrike

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Messages
1,283
Reaction score
106
Location
Anchorage
So what if I worked for the state (I don't) and needed to fly down to Juneau for a meeting. Do you believe it would be unethical for me to take my shotgun along and do some duck hunting before or after the meeting? Good for that guy taking advantage of the perks that came with being isolated and probably bored.
 

375JDJ

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
170
Reaction score
7
The employee should be able to hunt on their off duty time. I don't think the state boat should be used though and would expect the employee to pay costs to haul meat out if they are successful.
 

BMhunts

New member
Joined
Aug 11, 2013
Messages
37
Reaction score
1
Location
Anchorage, AK
I think that there isn't anything wrong with hunting in their off time. Also, they're in a remote location, the boat is their only form of transport so of course they should be able to use that too. I look at it all as being perks of the job.
 

sep

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
288
Reaction score
11
Location
North Pole
If you're concerned about it report it to F&G and let management deal with it. I know a retired brown shirt Alaska state trooper who got permission from the state to run a guiding business for many years while stationed in the bush. He actually worked as a hunting guide. I think he continued to run the business even once he got stationed back in more populated areas too.
 

Vance in AK

New member
Joined
Sep 28, 2006
Messages
1,908
Reaction score
60
Location
Kenai
When I was a helicopter mechanic I ran all over the road system in a company helicopter chasing helicopters . Same kinda deal. Be there to fuel them & if something breaks but long boring days sitting for 3-5 hours at a time waiting in fairly remote locations & then spending evenings & off days in places like Cantwell, Glenallen, Copper Center, Gulkana, etc. You better believe I took a gun & was hunting for whatever was legal. My boss (owner of company) had no problems with it or with me using company truck & fuel. He actually encouraged it. Perks of being SENT somewhere away from home & keeps employees happy. This is no different in my eyes.
 

willphish4food

New member
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
3,623
Reaction score
233
Location
Willow, AK
Some see them as perks. Others see it as necessary to maintaining sanity. Living remotely requires different rules than living in urban areas, as conditions are vastly different. The state paid for him to fly out to his work station and perform the stated duties at that station. As long as off time activities don't conflict with ontime duties practically or ethically, there is no problem.
 

hodgeman

New member
Joined
Jul 20, 2008
Messages
4,130
Reaction score
280
Location
Delta Junction AK
When I had a remote job (not F&G) out at the end of the the Chain...off time was just that- off. Heck my employer provided fishing gear, mountain bikes, a full gym and all kinds of other recreational equipment.

I couldn't hunt due to military regs dealing with guns...but the duck hunting there would have been off the charts good. There are some perks to being placed out in the boonies.
 

martentrapper

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
4,486
Reaction score
323
Location
Fairbanks, Ak.
The employee should be able to hunt on their off duty time. I don't think the state boat should be used though and would expect the employee to pay costs to haul meat out if they are successful.
Agree with 375. The use of public equipment for personal gain is not proper. Private enterprise "perks" are completely different than when using publicly owned items.
With that being said, Woundedknee...............how do you know the person was "hunting"? Also, that area is also a Wildlife Reuge. I know fed employees are there. Was this a state or fed employee? Pretty sure that local "seasonal" employees are working there also.
 

Akheloce

New member
Joined
Mar 16, 2008
Messages
1,208
Reaction score
97
Location
Homer
How different is it for the military to spend money on Morale, Welfare and Recreation?

Is using the government Internet in Afghanistan to chat with friends back home immoral?

How about bringing home an extra bag from a lower 48 shopping trip on a C-17? (The aircraft burns more fuel with more weight).

I once spent a weekend TDY in Bangor Maine, brought home a case of lobster which I picked up in a govt. rental car, and flew home in a govt aircraft.

Where does the line get drawn?

IMO, if the hunting trip is incidental to the work trip, it's no big deal. If the govt employee used govt resources expressly for going out to the cabin for a hunting trip, that's a different story.
 

alaskabliss

New member
Joined
Jul 9, 2008
Messages
1,419
Reaction score
85
Location
Wasilla
I don't see a problem with using personal time for personal recreation. I think some may be looking to stir a pot and the one who stirs the pot should have to lick the spoon.
 

hoose35

New member
Joined
Jul 30, 2008
Messages
3,068
Reaction score
122
Location
Soldotna, Alaska, United States
Only thing I will say about it is I feel if they are using the boat, they should have to pay the fuel bill while using it. How they would do that, I don't know
 

sayak

New member
Joined
Jun 16, 2006
Messages
6,117
Reaction score
643
Location
Central peninsula, between the K-rivers
I'd rather have ADFG employees that were hunters in their off hours, than ADFG employees that were anti-hunting, wouldn't you? There are too many of the bunny hugger sort these days. We need sympathetic biologists and techs.
 

Yukon Cornelius

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 29, 2013
Messages
1,531
Reaction score
40
Location
Alaska
Only thing I will say about it is I feel if they are using the boat, they should have to pay the fuel bill while using it. How they would do that, I don't know
Simple. You bring your own gas.

I am kind of a state employee. I just went on a three day hunting trip while at work. I had duties beyond my normal working hours. I got to use the boat. I bought 20 gallons of gas for myself. But when I had a student in the boat I didn't use my personal gas stash.

As mentioned above, where do we draw the line?
Most rural school districts have to charter a plane. Often times there are seats available on them. People utilize hose seats all the time for a discounted rate. Nothing wrong with that.
 

NRick

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 13, 2008
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
76
Location
Anchorage
Where does the line get drawn?

IMO, if the hunting trip is incidental to the work trip, it's no big deal. If the govt employee used govt resources expressly for going out to the cabin for a hunting trip, that's a different story.

"Incidental" is the key word here. I've killed, shipped back, and ate a lot of things while out on a job. I just took advantage of being in the right place at the right time. All of that was with privately owned companies, but would not have a problem with a state employee doing the same thing.
 
Top