Hand guns. How small is to small

.338 mag.

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
3,096
Reaction score
112
I like hand guns and I like shooting them. If I was richer I would have a lot more. It seems like there is no end to the small pistols and revolvers out there. I do believe if we are talking about a personal protection hand gun we reach a point where we can go to small and we sacrifice "power and combat accuracy" for ease of carry. But any gun is better then no gun. The new 9mm Solo from Kimber looks like a sweet little pistol as do some of the small size offering from Khar, Sig, S&W, Ruger, Glock, etc. As I said, a bunch to select from. I shoot my 1911 .45, the 9mm Browning Hi Power and 3" K Frame .357 the best. They all have good triggers, sights and fill the hand and balance well for me. My 70's made little Mod. 34 S&W .22 Kit Gun is hard to shoot well compared to a K Frame .22 and my little 2" S&W J Frame .38 Spl. requires a lot of effort from me if I move past 7 yards. I have a Glock 36 .45 that has surprised the heck out of me when I shoot it and I can hit the A Zone at speed at 7 yards and still hit at 25 yards and I expect the Glock 30SF I picked up is going to be as good or better. The dimensions of the Glock 36 do not measure out much bigger then the .38 Spl. J Frame yet there is a big difference in performance and power. So if you carry a gun for personal protection make sure it is up to the task. I don't waste much time debating between the 9mm and .45 as I believe a bunch of hand gun bullets in the right place is what works. For me it starts with my 3" .38 Spl. K Frame or 9mm Browning Hi Power and keeps on getting better from there up to the .45 1911 Govt. Mod.
 

tailwind

New member
Joined
May 31, 2010
Messages
1,292
Reaction score
104
IMO, no gun is the gun that is too small:)

I feel alot better with a hi-cap .22 than with nothing, but when I get into .357 energy levels I get comfortable.

Also, in Alaska, 2 legged critters might be less of a concern than 4 legged. I would taylor my carry choices to my location.
 

1Cor15:19

Well-known member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
2,482
Reaction score
184
Location
Dillingham, AK
Also, in Alaska, 2 legged critters might be less of a concern than 4 legged. I would taylor my carry choices to my location.
I am always more concerned about 2 legged miscreants, but I suppose the 4 legged varmints can be hazardous as well...
 

rbuck351

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
3,191
Reaction score
145
Location
Eureka MT
Too small is one that is too small to get a good grip on. The Ruger Redhawk is too small for me with that little grip. Easy to fix but that small factory grip doesn't fit me well. Most of the small autos don't fit my hand well. I like something I can get a good solid grip on. Everybodys hand is different.
 

jwp500

New member
Joined
Apr 10, 2008
Messages
747
Reaction score
19
IMO, no gun is the gun that is too small:)

I feel alot better with a hi-cap .22 than with nothing, but when I get into .357 energy levels I get comfortable.

Also, in Alaska, 2 legged critters might be less of a concern than 4 legged. I would taylor my carry choices to my location.



+1....................Spot on
 

Smitty of the North

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
9,202
Reaction score
272
Location
SwampView AK, Overlooking Mt. Mckinley and Points
Also, in Alaska, 2 legged critters might be less of a concern than 4 legged. I would taylor my carry choices to my location.

Yep, it's either a Field Gun or a Hme Defense, gun. At the least, Field loads or Hme Defense loads.

I like 357, but I can't tolerate those little lightweight snub-nose jobby doos, even with 38s. Our 38s have longer barrels, as does my one 357 Mag.

The trend in handguns is too often, popularity over practicality. It makes absolutely, no sense, IMO.

Smitty of the North
 

BrownBear

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
10,003
Reaction score
243
I got a little tiny Walther that shoots 22 shorts from a buddy of mine. He gave it to me! Said he never wanted to see it again.

Of course, he was all bandaged up when he handed it off. When he was bracing it for a shot he got the first finger of his brace hand out in front of the barrel and shot the tip right off. For him at least, it was just a might too small. :D
 

1Cor15:19

Well-known member
Joined
May 11, 2009
Messages
2,482
Reaction score
184
Location
Dillingham, AK
Of course, he was all bandaged up when he handed it off. When he was bracing it for a shot he got the first finger of his brace hand out in front of the barrel and shot the tip right off. For him at least, it was just a might too small. :D
Ouch! Bad deal for your buddy.
 

HUNTERKJL

Active member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
434
Reaction score
34
Location
Wasilla, Alaska
I'm with you guys on what has been stated so far. A handgun just has to fit my hand right first, then have a decent trigger pull. It is funny though that a rare small handgun can be very accurate. One of the only ones I have found I can shoot decent is a Beretta 21 in 22LR. It has trouble cycling reliably with anything but CCI Stingers. Shooting these, it is 100% reliable and can hit targets way out given its size. Amazing considering the tiny crude sights?? Just don't make sense.

For me, ideal carry size and shootability, its a commander sized 1911 with a full sized government model not much harder to carry/conceal. For DA/SA autos, I really like a Sig 229. For revolvers, anything less than a 4" barrel for me becomes inacurate?? It is funny how every individual will have preferences and shoot well with that handgun and the next guy couldn't hit the broad side of a barn with it?
 

Smitty of the North

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
9,202
Reaction score
272
Location
SwampView AK, Overlooking Mt. Mckinley and Points
It is funny though that a rare small handgun can be very accurate. One of the only ones I have found I can shoot decent is a Beretta 21 in 22LR. It has trouble cycling reliably with anything but CCI Stingers. Shooting these, it is 100% reliable and can hit targets way out given its size. Amazing considering the tiny crude sights?? Just don't make sense.

Same here.

I'm amazed at how accurately, Beretta my 21 shoots.

I could keel a Wabbit, I betcha.

I don't shoot nuthin but CCI Blazer Ammo, and it's never jams.

Smitty of the North
 

HUNTERKJL

Active member
Joined
Sep 17, 2007
Messages
434
Reaction score
34
Location
Wasilla, Alaska
Yea Smitty, one fine day in AZ, I was regularly hitting gallon jugs with mine out maybe a 100 yards! Took several rounds to figure the hold over amount, but by gosh I was hitting regularly. I never could do that with a 38 snubbie? Always wished Beretta would have made a tip up barreled 380 about the same size, but it must not be possible with the design as they only made them in 22, 25, and 32. They make for a nice little pocket gun.
 

Oneriver

New member
Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
288
Reaction score
5
Here is a excert from Handgunner mag...Big gun Medium gun.....Ear Blaster
You recently got a letter from a guy
who thought the .357 magnum was
uncomfortably loud and he was afraid it
would damage his hearing. You recommended
a 9mm or a .38 Special. You
failed, however, to point out the .357
magnum has superior stopping power
when compared to either a 9mm or .38.
I don't know your correspondent, but it
appears he is more concerned about his
hearing than about his survival. In addition,
I feel it's unlikely that as many as
six rounds from a .357 will cause permanent
hearing loss. I presume he's not
regularly firing full magnum rounds in
his bedroom!
Jon Lawrence
Eureka , Calif.
Jon, I've fired .357 magnums in an
enclosed room during training. The
muzzle blast and noise are numbing. I
checked with my doctor friend Davis
Bronson, who is also a shooter: "Six
rounds - even one round - from a
high-intensity round like a .357 in an
enclosed area will likely cause hearing
damage and it may heal - or it may
not. And the likelihood of causing permanent
damage is definitely there."
Also, after seeing several people shot
and some killed over my 20 years as a
street cop in San Diego, I can personally
attest the difference in "stopping" power
between a good quality 9mm load, a .38,
.40 .45, .357, etc. is minimal. During
post-mortems I was fortunate enough
to attend with my old friend Gene Wolberg
from the crime lab, I learned it's
almost impossible to tell the difference
between the wounds of pistol-caliber
rounds. It's always better to have something
controllable that doesn't knock
you senseless from muzzle blast, noise,
flash and recoil. Hitting accurately and
fast is what's critical. At the time I left
the PD (around 1999) we had killed 74
criminals with 147 gr. sub-sonic 9mm
loads. Most were one- or two-shot stops.
If they were hit right, they went down.
And the 9mm proved to be controllable,
easy to handle and quick for follow-up
shots. Since their change allowing .40
and .45 handguns, the stopping rate has
Continued on page 100remained the same, regardless of caliber.
On a side note, I once watched a
gang member take a load of police
buckshot into his lower back area from
about 35 feet when he pulled down on
a group of cops during a felony vehicle
stop. He ran almost a block, shooting,
before he fell. So "stopping" power
isn't all it's cracked up to be, unless
you're using a centerfire rifle of at least
medium caliber. And Clint would be
happy to talk to you about that! Editor
 

Smitty of the North

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
9,202
Reaction score
272
Location
SwampView AK, Overlooking Mt. Mckinley and Points
Yea Smitty, one fine day in AZ, I was regularly hitting gallon jugs with mine out maybe a 100 yards! Took several rounds to figure the hold over amount, but by gosh I was hitting regularly. I never could do that with a 38 snubbie? Always wished Beretta would have made a tip up barreled 380 about the same size, but it must not be possible with the design as they only made them in 22, 25, and 32. They make for a nice little pocket gun.

I wish they would make the Tip-Up barrel a lot longer. That might qualify it as a Survival, or Kit gun.

A long time ago, I owned a Beretta, about the same size as the 21, but it didn't have the double action on the first shot feature.

It was chambered for 22 Short. I used to shoot it at trees, and the trees didn't notice, but my ears certainly did. The sound was reely sharp, and as I remember, the accuracy wasn't very good.

IIRC, they had a longer barrel version. I never seen one, but I can picture, pictures of it in my mind.

Smitty of the North
 

sthrcave

New member
Joined
Jan 27, 2008
Messages
248
Reaction score
13
Location
Eagle River
IMO, no gun is the gun that is too small:)

I feel alot better with a hi-cap .22 than with nothing, but when I get into .357 energy levels I get comfortable.

Also, in Alaska, 2 legged critters might be less of a concern than 4 legged. I would taylor my carry choices to my location.

I have had much more trouble with 2 legged critters than the 4 legged variety. I carry a 1911 or a M&P and my wife carries a J-frame .357. Between my former shady neighbors, and getting shot at on Glenn Hwy, I don't leave home without my handgun. The incident where my car got some unwanted ventilation occured at the Mt. View light on the Glenn. It was on the news after it happened. My insurance adjuster asked me to repeat the story of what happened again after I told him because he thought I was joking.

I still carry a .44 or shotgun when in the woods hiking, fishing, or doing whatever. I have had to fire a warning shot once. This happened near the Russian River ferry when a pair of young brownies started herding fisherman down the bank so as to get at their stringers. Everyone got pushed down to the end of the cut bank into my fishing spot. The bears kept coming and were showing no fear. They weren't being outwardly aggressive either. There were several guys out there with guns drawn, and I figured I would scare the bears off before someone got stupid and shot one of them. I fired two rounds into a stump and the bears beat feet.

I think that the size of the gun is irrelevent if you can't shoot it in the first place. The smallest pistol I carry is my wife's J-frame occasionally. I can put all 5 rounds into center mass on a military M9 target at ten yards. If I couldn't do that with repeatability I would not carry that pistol. If my wife couldn't she wouldn't carry it either. I can do the same with my 1911 and my M&P. If I couldn't what would be the point in lugging it around? I would not be able to effectively defend myself, and I would be a serious danger to others unlucky enough to be in the area. I think that a lot of people go out and buy handguns for self defense because they are comfortable to carry or look cool. By doing this they fail to spend the time to find something that they shoot well. So in answer to the question about how small is too small, I would have to say the the gun that you cannot effectively defend yourself with is too small. The smaller the grip and sight radius the more difficult it is to shoot. Maybe not for everyone, but for 98% of handgunners out there, yes.
 

Oneriver

New member
Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
288
Reaction score
5
Thanks for postin that Oneriver:

Smitty of the North

It seems like the debate about caliber for defense purposes goes on forever..that Handgunner mag excert says it all for me..I have a 1911 that I love; a J-frame, 5 .45Colts and 2 Glock 9mm...I carry the 9's most of the time...hi cap mags..very controllable...comfortable to carry...just pick the right ammo...for bears I carry a shotgun, a .338 mag and a .45 Colt with big flat nose bullets...and no I don't carry it all at the same time
 

iofthetaiga

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
9,462
Reaction score
937
Location
Tanana Valley AK
Hand guns. How small is to small
Seems a pretty simple question. If you empty your small handgun into your attacker, on target to his center of mass, and he continues to reach you, then proceeds to pummel you to death... Well, it was too small.:)
 

MyTime

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Messages
306
Reaction score
14
338,

Oh, you want opinions....I can do that! So how small is too small? I guess that answer would be best known following an incident, if there was one. Of course by then it may be a bit late if you had chosen poorly. I like semi-autos. I feel comfort carrying my G30 45 ACP when I'm out and about and I am concerned about 2-legged critters. At my bedside table I have a S&W M&P 45 ACP with night sights. I just like the 45 ACP, shooting it, reloading it, making more excuses to practice with it, and having it with me. For the 4-legged critters I've been a fan of the 10mm for 25+ years. Today I just dropped some $$$ to get a Lone Wolf long slide setup (with 6.61 inch barrel and night sights) for my G20...strictly for in-the-woods carry and practice at the range. Also, revolvers can provide options that a semi-auto can't so many prefer them but I have more experience and, therefore, more comfort with a semi-auto.

Now, does my appreciation for the 45 ACP and the 10mm make me right? Nope, it's simply my preference. I'm comfortable carrying what I shoot well. Opinion completed :)

Just sayin's all. have a great day all!

MyTime
 

rbuck351

New member
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
3,191
Reaction score
145
Location
Eureka MT
I was thinking the question was how small of a gun is to small not how small of a cartridge is to small.
 

MyTime

Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2010
Messages
306
Reaction score
14
I was thinking the question was how small of a gun is to small not how small of a cartridge is to small.

Oh, my bust. In the words of the famed commentator Emily Litella from Saturday Night Live..."Never mind!"

He he he!

MyTime
 

Latest posts

Top