Another Dam! The Talkeetna Thus Time

Birdstrike

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 30, 2007
Messages
1,283
Reaction score
106
Location
Anchorage

BlueMoose

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
1,832
Reaction score
114
Location
Rifle River MI
I am not a fan of any dam however I am a favor of developing resources and lowering the price a doing business. I guess it is a catch 22. Being that I love to raft, fish and camp bummer however if someone could lower the energy cost in Fairbanks, Delta, Healy and all places in between well.

One of the things some people don't understand is the pain we feel in the Interior concerning energy cost. As much as I don't like to see any wilderness change in that area it will eventually happen. I wonder how long it would take if in fact people in Anchorage and the Valley started seeing $300 - $500 dollar a month electric bills to consider building a dam for .6 cent per KW versus the .17-24 cent per KW plus a fuel surcharge of sometime twice their electric bill.

Not saying it is a good thing to have the dam just that one day certain forces will create the demand.

Regards.
 

SkinnyD

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2010
Messages
1,379
Reaction score
177
Location
20B
You heard the whining when their gas bills went up a few dollars in Anchorage... as Fairbanks folks said "Sign me up for that price!"
 

Frostbitten

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
3,426
Reaction score
234
Location
Alaska - I wasn't born here, but I got here as soo
I am not a fan of any dam however I am a favor of developing resources and lowering the price a doing business. I guess it is a catch 22. Being that I love to raft, fish and camp bummer however if someone could lower the energy cost in Fairbanks, Delta, Healy and all places in between well.

One of the things some people don't understand is the pain we feel in the Interior concerning energy cost. As much as I don't like to see any wilderness change in that area it will eventually happen. I wonder how long it would take if in fact people in Anchorage and the Valley started seeing $300 - $500 dollar a month electric bills to consider building a dam for .6 cent per KW versus the .17-24 cent per KW plus a fuel surcharge of sometime twice their electric bill.

Not saying it is a good thing to have the dam just that one day certain forces will create the demand.

Regards.

What do the folks in Anchorage and the Valley have to do with this?
 

BlueMoose

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
1,832
Reaction score
114
Location
Rifle River MI
Nothing I was simply stating that if in fact the bulk of the population in the state in this case Anchorage and the Valley were paying higher energy cost like we see that some form of resource development would have happened or would be happening to include a Gas Pipe Line and or a Dam. Sorry B-Strike for some what pimping your thread.

My intent is not to ruffle feathers and or pit one group or region against another my point and intent was to point out that eventually a Dam and or new energy source will be a requirement.
 

Frostbitten

New member
Joined
Jun 25, 2010
Messages
3,426
Reaction score
234
Location
Alaska - I wasn't born here, but I got here as soo
Nothing I was simply stating that if in fact the bulk of the population in the state in this case Anchorage and the Valley were paying higher energy cost like we see that some form of resource development would have happened or would be happening to include a Gas Pipe Line and or a Dam. Sorry B-Strike for some what pimping your thread.

My intent is not to ruffle feathers and or pit one group or region against another my point and intent was to point out that eventually a Dam and or new energy source will be a requirement.

Roger that, and that's a fair point.
 

AGL4now

Unavailable
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
9,616
Reaction score
625
Well, how about a big NUCLEAR Power Plant.........???? People keep moving to Alaska, and People want their electric thingies.
 

Erik in AK

New member
Joined
Jul 15, 2006
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
389
Location
Bryantown MD
My Alaskan energy pipe dream: Coal and small nukes

We have lots of low-sulfur coal that we sell to South Korea because we don't burn it here. The Healy Clean-Coal project was doomed from the get-go because you don't build power plants close to the fuel, you build them close to the consumer. That said, with the rail spur going in on Pt Mac I'd build a clean coal plant there with a 30 year expansion plan in place before the ground was broken. It's far cheaper (more efficient) to ship the coal to the plant than push the juice through hundreds of miles of wire.

Build a plant there, add another in Nenana for the Fairbanks area, and one in the Copper Valley.

As for the nukes? Way back in the ancient days of the early 90's Toshiba developed a portable low-yield nuclear power plant that fit inside a single shipping container. It cost half a million dollars and could power 1,500 homes for 25 years. Galena had applied for a waiver from the DoE/NRC to be a test community. Don't know whatever happened to that, but as a concept it could revolutionize energy availability for bush Alaska. (The material was non-weaponize-able)

Gas would be great, awesome wonderful but as it stands it's not economically feasible to bring it to our local markets without exporting it. We need large, long term contracts to amortize the infrastructure needed to get it to our homes and businesses. A 60 billion dollar bill split 200,000 ways over 30 years is a debt we cannot afford. (if you ever had one of those "Canada my *****! It's Alaska's gas!" bumper stickers you might be an idiot)

As for dams? Damming the Su or Talkeetna might make sense if there was a massive mineral deposit in need of electricity but that's not the case. In either case these dams would face about the same dilemma as the Healy coal plant, namely being too far from the primary consumers.

So, anyway, Coal and ATCO nukes. YMMV
 

Roger45

New member
Joined
Apr 25, 2006
Messages
1,063
Reaction score
30
Location
Palmer, AK
Government looks for cheap and easy solutions. To me, you never make government more efficient by making it more complicated. Everything in Alaska seems to revolve around the Slope and what happens on the Slope. We have a road there and a pipeline as well. Almost every building up there is on a pad and can be easily moved or dismantled. Why not install a power generation plant there, (fueled by natural gas or oil), run power lines down the pipeline road, and power the State? Seems to me this would be relatively simple solution, but then again I am not a scientist nor have any idea of the "unintended consequences", but it would be the least invasive way to cheaply power Alaska...
 

Brian M

***** Admin
Joined
Sep 17, 2005
Messages
14,334
Reaction score
971
Location
Eagle River, AK
In-ground coal gassification could solve a lot of our energy needs. CIRI was working on this in the late 2000s, but I'm not sure what came of it. I certainly hope that work is continuing, as it can be done economically on a small enough scale to work for Alaska and it wouldn't require digging up huge amounts of habitat like traditional coal mining often does.
 

kasilofchrisn

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
374
Location
Central Kenai Peninsula
Government looks for cheap and easy solutions. To me, you never make government more efficient by making it more complicated. Everything in Alaska seems to revolve around the Slope and what happens on the Slope. We have a road there and a pipeline as well. Almost every building up there is on a pad and can be easily moved or dismantled. Why not install a power generation plant there, (fueled by natural gas or oil), run power lines down the pipeline road, and power the State? Seems to me this would be relatively simple solution, but then again I am not a scientist nor have any idea of the "unintended consequences", but it would be the least invasive way to cheaply power Alaska...
You loose too much power in the lines over that distance.
I'm no expert but have read that your idea isn't feasible.
Plus maintenance would be a nightmare.
 

iofthetaiga

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
9,184
Reaction score
778
Location
Tanana Valley AK
Instead lets close all the mines! Nobody needs anything that is mined anyway right?
Au contraire! We need mines so we can make steel to reinforce concrete to build dams. And steel to build mining equipment. And copper and aluminum to make power lines to transmit electricity to mines so Canadian companies can mine gold to make jewelry for pudgy pink American consumers!
 

kasilofchrisn

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
374
Location
Central Kenai Peninsula
Au contraire! We need mines so we can make steel to reinforce concrete to build dams. And steel to build mining equipment. And copper and aluminum to make power lines to transmit electricity to mines so Canadian companies can mine gold for jewelry!
Says the guy using the computer to type his message.
Oh wait there's no gold or copper in the computer your typing on correct?
And your computer doesn't require electricity correct?
 

iofthetaiga

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
9,184
Reaction score
778
Location
Tanana Valley AK
Says the guy using the computer to type his message.
Oh wait there's no gold or copper in the computer your typing on correct?
And your computer doesn't require electricity correct?
The amount of gold in my computer wouldn't buy you a cup of coffee at McDonalds. Less than about 10% of gold mined globally is used for industrial purposes. About 60% of gold mined globally is used for jewelry. The remainder is hoarded by people who assign completely arbitrary value to it and view it as an "investment". We've already mined more than enough gold to satisfy our industrial needs for as long as humans are likely to survive as a species (a length of time which we as a species are diligently working to diminish at an ever increasing rate).
 

kasilofchrisn

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
374
Location
Central Kenai Peninsula
Less than about 10% of gold mined globally is used for industrial purposes. The amount of gold in my computer wouldn't buy you a cup of coffee at McDonalds. About 60% of gold mined globally is used for jewelry. We've already mined more than enough gold to satisfy our industrial needs for as long as humans are likely to survive as a species (a length of time which we as a species are diligently working to diminish at an ever increasing rate).
Ok so you also do not use lead,zinc,steel,or any other minerals that are mined do you?
I don't support all mining,but I am smart enough to realize the importance of mining in my daily life.
How everything that can't be grown must be mined.
But I'm sure you don't shoot lead bullets or use lead fishing sinkers.
You don't drive a vehicle made of steel.
You don't use products galvanized with zinc. Etc. Etc.
Does your wife wear jewelry?
I suppose not.
 

iofthetaiga

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 5, 2009
Messages
9,184
Reaction score
778
Location
Tanana Valley AK
Ok so you also do not use lead,zinc,steel,or any other minerals that are mined do you?
I don't support all mining,but I am smart enough to realize the importance of mining in my daily life.
How everything that can't be grown must be mined.
But I'm sure you don't shoot lead bullets or use lead fishing sinkers.
You don't drive a vehicle made of steel.
You don't use products galvanized with zinc. Etc. Etc.
Does your wife wear jewelry?
I suppose not.
You're absolutely correct, and I am all for gross ignorant consumerism! Dam them all, and mine everything we can find! Short term jobs are the way to long term survival. The faster we dam it and mine it, the better off we'll all be!
 

kasilofchrisn

New member
Joined
Jan 4, 2009
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
374
Location
Central Kenai Peninsula
You're absolutely correct, and I am all for gross ignorant consumerism! Dam them all, and mine everything we can find! Short term jobs are the way to long term survival. The faster we dam it and mine it, the better off we'll be!
That's not at all what I am saying.
But I don't drive my truck around thinking how bad iron mines are or how bad oil companies are while I fill up my tank at the gas station.
I don't live In a sod hut.
My house is made of wood some logger cut. And milled into boards at a lumber mill.
I've worked In Alaska's largest mines and in Alaska's largest oilfields and refineries.
I know that responsible development can happen and it does so every day.
I don't support all development.
I'm not sure I support this dam project.
But I do want more info before condemning them.
The slope had a 20 year projected lifespan yet I just received another PFD yesterday and will see another oilfield paycheck deposited in Friday.
Hmm short term is a relative thing I guess.

Btw If big oil is so bad you can pm me your address so I can come collect your PFD check.
 
Top