Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

More on Hornady and Ruger and pretty pictures

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #2
    One thing interesting about the M77 in the above picture, it doesn't seem to have the standard Ruger ring mounts on it. Looks like bases, and quick detach rings. Wonder if Ruger is going to be changing their scope mounting system for the M77's...

    Comment


    • #3
      "You've never shot anything like this before"....Unless you have a .375-.338.

      I'm actually very interested in the .375 Ruger it looks very much like a beltless 375 Taylor. I wonder if anybody has any chamber reamers yet?
      I may be slow, but I get where I'm going!

      Comment


      • #4
        Whats the 375 ruger got that the 375 H&H dont?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by svehunter View Post
          Whats the 375 ruger got that the 375 H&H dont?
          svehunter,

          Fits in any standard action seems to be one of the major benefits. Plus it was designed for shorter length barrels. I'm sure there is more, but these are the ones that caught my attention.

          Comment


          • #6
            Warne

            Warne makes QD rings that mount directly to Ruger integral bases.

            Comment


            • #7
              $$$

              I was wondering if anyone has heard what they're gonna charge for a box of this new 375 ruger? Or what the new M77 hawkeye in 375 ruger will cost??
              I once held the yardstick of anothers perfection, I threw it down and carved my own................

              Comment


              • #8
                ? different

                ?belt
                ?head space on datum line
                ?shorter powder column
                ?more efficient case
                ?cost
                ?availability
                "Actions speak louder than words - 'nough said"

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by shphtr View Post
                  ?belt
                  ?head space on datum line
                  ?shorter powder column
                  ?more efficient case
                  ?cost
                  ?availability
                  Belt-no belt
                  Head space-unkown
                  Shorter powder column-has to be
                  More efficient case-most likely
                  Cost-more than I'll want to pay
                  Availability-hahahahaha!
                  I may be slow, but I get where I'm going!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I am really looking forward to a Ruger #1 in the 9.3x74. I hope it is not long in coming.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      .416?

                      I wonder if a .416 could be made out of this case that would be able to headspace on the shoulder? It seems it would have more case capacity that the .416 Taylor in the same length action?
                      "Everything that lives and moves will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything."

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Not sure that I don't like this one a bit better...

                        http://www.ruger.com/Firearms/PDF/Ne...G_MKII-A-S.pdf

                        .338 Federal or .358 Winchester, stainless, laminated stock, even get the spiffy barrel scope mount.....

                        Comment

                        Footer Adsense

                        Collapse
                        Working...
                        X