Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Requested - New Limits on Sports Fishing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Comments Requested - New Limits on Sports Fishing

    I am doing an article for the next issue of Sportsman's News Magazine and would like any of your comments on the new limits and the emergency regulations curbing sports fishing in Alaska to compensate for the overfishing by commercial operators.

    1) should sports fishermen have to pay for the sins of the commercial fishermen?
    2) I see lots of numbers on how many fish are harvested by commercial fishermen, but nothing on how many fish are harvested by sports fishermen. Anyone have a source for those numbers?
    3) Any thoughts on how much tourist revenue Alaska stands to loose as a result of these new regulations.

    Any thoughts or directions greatly appreciated. Thanks.

    Dan Kidder
    Managing Editor
    Sportsman's News

  • #2
    1) I don't think you know what you are talking about.

    2) You should know what you are talking about to ask a pertinent question

    3)"to compensate for the overfishing by commercial operators." is the main one.......care to explain with facts how that is so? Which commercial operators? Overfishing in what way?

    4) I think you are intentionally trying to starts some kind of flame thread and wonder if you are really even writing an article.

    Anyway have to go teach some fish ID. Have a great day, and think about how you could illuminate us on your position better if you would.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Sportsman's News View Post
      I am doing an article for the next issue of Sportsman's News Magazine and would like any of your comments on the new limits and the emergency regulations curbing sports fishing in Alaska to compensate for the overfishing by commercial operators.

      1) should sports fishermen have to pay for the sins of the commercial fishermen?
      2) I see lots of numbers on how many fish are harvested by commercial fishermen, but nothing on how many fish are harvested by sports fishermen. Anyone have a source for those numbers?
      3) Any thoughts on how much tourist revenue Alaska stands to loose as a result of these new regulations.

      Any thoughts or directions greatly appreciated. Thanks.

      Dan Kidder
      Managing Editor
      Sportsman's News
      Get your wording right! By "commercial fishermen" do you mean the longliners or the charter boats??? The longliners have a limited number of pounds to catch(quota's) but there are more and more charter boats in business each year and that in turn means more people going out on the charters and catching more fish. So why should the fish be taken away from the true commercial fishermen and be given to the new charter operators. It's like me going to your job and saying go take a break(without pay) and i'm going to do your job for awhile because i want to do what your doing. I think you got things backwards its, should the commercial fishermen have to pay(with fish) for the sins(large growth) of the charter fisheries.
      sigpic
      Alaska Shrimp Pots

      Rigid & Folding Shrimp & Crab Pots
      Electra Dyne Pot Haulers
      Ropes, Buoys, Bait
      alaskashrimppots.com
      akshrimppots@mtaonline.net
      907 775 1692

      Comment


      • #4
        Commercial=those that make their living removing fish from the available stocks. Wether it be by the charter fleet, commercial netters/long liners etc. This includes targetted as well as bycatch species.

        I'm one of your tourists and I think there are already repercussions from the decreased limits in south east AK. One of the captains in Juneau reported last week that he had to refund $7500 due to cancellations.
        As an outsider I don't agree at all with sports fishermen having to foot the bill for commercial overharvest.

        I am particularly bitter that as a non Alaskan I have to cough up $145 for a seasonal license to pay for a hatchery so that commercial fishermen can keep up their catch ratios. I think as the main consumer of fisheries stocks that the cost of the new hacheries should be put on them. I would be even more bitter if I was there to fish kings and had to pony up another $100 for a king stamp. As a tourist I can forsee a sizable drop in tourist revenues due to the make the tourists pay attitude of the ADFG.
        In my previous 4 trips to Alaska I have harvested 4 fish, 2 chicken halibut and 2 silvers for the BBQ back at camp.

        If Alaska wants to charge non resident sportsmen to build their new hatcheries the least they could do is offer a conservation license for those of us that do not fill our coolers for the trip outside.

        It may be time for me to start filling my cooler to make it worth while paying the $145 just to fish in Alaska.

        That's my .02 from an outsider.
        sigpic
        www.arcticangler.ca
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy_7mPiqoqw&t=11s

        Comment


        • #5
          Dan Kidder - you are way over the line

          Dear Dan,

          We have no way of telling if you really are Dan Kidder or not, but if you really are him, then as managing editor of the official publication of Sportsman's Warehouse, you are completely unaware of journalistic integrity, ethics, and objectivsim in reporting. Talk about coming in with an extremely biased slant! Not only is your post requesting information ridiculous and pot-stirring more than anything, but if this is the way Sportsman's Warehouse intends to do business, then they have just lost a customer.

          Sincerely,
          Mark Richards
          www.residenthuntersofalaska.org

          Comment


          • #6
            Dan Kidder - completely over the line

            http://www.forums.outdoorsdirectory....65&postcount=4
            Mark Richards
            www.residenthuntersofalaska.org

            Comment


            • #7
              Premise problems

              I also don't agree with the bias of your premise. Perhaps you should scrap the us vs. them mentality and do some real conservation research before publishing said article.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Sportsman's News View Post
                .

                1) should sports fishermen have to pay for the sins of the commercial fishermen?
                2) I see lots of numbers on how many fish are harvested by commercial fishermen, but nothing on how many fish are harvested by sports fishermen. Anyone have a source for those numbers?
                3) Any thoughts on how much tourist revenue Alaska stands to loose as a result of these new regulations.
                1) We all need to make adjustments to preseve what we have before it's to far gone to bring back. We need to get away from the mentallity "as long it dosen't affect me I'm not worried about it" What one does affects all.
                It really stinks when we have to point/single out one group IE, commerical, charters, or private fisherman. this turns everyone against that group.

                2) Fish and Game does dock checks and takes samples. Give them a call. I had this done to me about a dozen times. They also ask where (location) the fish was caught.

                3) This year might not be to bad but next year should affect the charters. I do belive the price of gas will have a bigger affect of the tourist going out. Charters are going have to raise prices to maintain there business and with the one fish limit I don't see people paying all that money just for one fish.
                Living the Alaskan Dream
                Gary Keller
                Anchorage, AK

                Comment


                • #9
                  I kinda agree with ABF.

                  Exactly what fishery(s) are you talking about? How are they being "overfished" by commercial fishermen? Hopefully you aware that emergency orders are a lawful, effective, and successful way to manage Alaska fisheries.

                  1) What "sins of commercial fishermen" are you talking about? It seems to me you're already bias, which makes for horrible journalism. Hopefully you realize it's a two-way street...commercial fishermen are also regulated by what happens in the sport fishing industry, and the sportsfishing industry is not without their own "sins".

                  2) Please do some research. ADF&G will have data available for most fisheries. Also consider the negative impacts sportfishing has on other important fish-rearing aspects...habitat degradation, pollution, etc. and the costs associated with rehabilitation.

                  3) "Tourist revenue" is of little concern in the face of healthy fisheries and the future of healthy fisheries for generations to come.

                  Dan, what experience do you have with these fisheries that qualifies you for writing an article, and where have you gotten your information so far? Unfortunately so many people believe what they read in magazines, when really what they are reading is nothing more than misinformation written by someone with either an agenda, or someone who doesn't understand what they are writing. You're in a perfect position to do what is right and provide accurate, non-bias information. Lets hope you do that.

                  Edit: Thanks bushrat...I just read that.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Sportsman's News
                    I am doing an article for the next issue of Sportsman's News Magazine and would like any of your comments on the new limits and the emergency regulations curbing sports fishing in Alaska to compensate for the overfishing by commercial operators.

                    1) should sports fishermen have to pay for the sins of the commercial fishermen?
                    2) I see lots of numbers on how many fish are harvested by commercial fishermen, but nothing on how many fish are harvested by sports fishermen. Anyone have a source for those numbers?
                    3) Any thoughts on how much tourist revenue Alaska stands to loose as a result of these new regulations.

                    Any thoughts or directions greatly appreciated. Thanks.

                    Dan Kidder
                    Managing Editor
                    Sportsman's News
                    is this someone,s idea of a very bad joke?

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Well, this thread ought to end up being a real kick in the pants.

                      Originally posted by bushrat View Post
                      Dan Kidder - you are way over the line......
                      Well, Dan, welcome to the "Over the Line Club"! I think I'm a charter member.

                      Keep up the good work. A few more posts and bushrat will put you on electronic ignore (IOW, cup his hands over his ears, sing "la, la, la, la" repeatedly, and then call you "out of touch with reality".............)

                      I agree with potbuilder when it comes to halibut. Commercial fishermen (the ones who catch and sell in bulk) have already been effectively limited with quotas, which is a hellava lot better scheme than the "limited entry" scam that limited commercial salmon fishing.

                      More, since IFQs for halibut came into play, the number of charter operators has ballooned. There should be limits on this, too, if fish numbers are shown to be suffering.

                      ......2) I see lots of numbers on how many fish are harvested by commercial fishermen, but nothing on how many fish are harvested by sports fishermen. Anyone have a source for those numbers?....
                      I don't think you'll find tallys with these numbers consistently from year to year like with the commercial industry, and there should be an effort to acquire them before launching into sport limitations "based on science".

                      .....3) Any thoughts on how much tourist revenue Alaska stands to loose as a result of these new regulations.
                      I don't care about tourist revenue. I don't gain from it, I'm not employed in an industry that benefits from it, I don't like visiting their homeland, and don't much care if they visit here or not.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Sportsman's News View Post
                        I am doing an article for the next issue of Sportsman's News Magazine and would like any of your comments on the new limits and the emergency regulations curbing sports fishing in Alaska to compensate for the overfishing by commercial operators.

                        1) should sports fishermen have to pay for the sins of the commercial fishermen?
                        2) I see lots of numbers on how many fish are harvested by commercial fishermen, but nothing on how many fish are harvested by sports fishermen. Anyone have a source for those numbers?
                        3) Any thoughts on how much tourist revenue Alaska stands to loose as a result of these new regulations.

                        Any thoughts or directions greatly appreciated. Thanks.

                        Dan Kidder
                        Managing Editor
                        Sportsman's News
                        try asking where the answer isn't implicit in your question. why ask when you already know what you want to hear?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by bushrat
                          as managing editor of the official publication of Sportsman's Warehouse
                          Well, it is called "Sportsman's" Warehouse, and they make tons of money from sportsfishermen. If it were called "Commercialman's" Warehouse, and sold commercial fishing gear, Dan would be singing (writing) to a different tune.


                          DRIFTER_016, nobody is forcing you to come to Alaska. If you don't like their fees or their fisheries, you certainly have the choice to go somewhere else. But I know of no other State that offers the opportunity to take unlimited quantities of salmon, halibut, shrimp, rockfish, trout, clams, crab, etc. for a lousy "$145" in non-res licensing fees. The amount of resource that leaves this state is mind-boggling. Demand for their fish is astounding, and Alaska can't charge enough for it if you ask me.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Grampyfishes View Post
                            DRIFTER_016, nobody is forcing you to come to Alaska. If you don't like their fees or their fisheries, you certainly have the choice to go somewhere else. But I know of no other State that offers the opportunity to take unlimited quantities of salmon, halibut, shrimp, rockfish, trout, clams, crab, etc. for a lousy "$145" in non-res licensing fees. The amount of resource that leaves this state is mind-boggling. Demand for their fish is astounding, and Alaska can't charge enough for it if you ask me.
                            Unlimited=over fishing wether it be by sports or commercial fishiermen. Why is it that commercial fishermen have a quota but sports fishermen can take all they want????
                            If you read my post a little closer the reason I'm bitter is because they don't offer an alternative conservation type license for thos of us that don't pillage the fish stocks.
                            In Ontario, CA they have regular and conservation licenses, with reduced limits on the conservation licenses.
                            Also regulations on posession limits in Canada refer to fish in your posession wether they be frozen & packaged or not. I don't know how the fact that the fish is frozen and vaccume packed it is no longer deemed in posession. :confused: If you posess the fish is it not in posession????
                            In Canada a fish is deemed in posession until it is consumed.
                            Makes sense, no?
                            If posession regulations were reformed the strain on the resource would decrease, would it not?
                            It's rediculous to me that I can go and get a limit every day and as long as it's processed and frozen it doesn't cout! :mad:
                            sigpic
                            www.arcticangler.ca
                            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gy_7mPiqoqw&t=11s

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              DRIFTER_016, You bring up an interesting point about "posession".
                              Living the Alaskan Dream
                              Gary Keller
                              Anchorage, AK

                              Comment

                              Footer Adsense

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X