Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

land ownership at mud lake

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • land ownership at mud lake

    I was recently looking at a map that shows land ownership - Hunt Map application for cell phones and computers... really cool little app, btw... In looking at the map, it shows mud lake (not just the parking area, but the lake itself) as being Eklutna land. Does anyone know if this is true? And if it is, have us 'non Eklutna' peeps been granted grandfather rights to access?

    The last time I was out there duck hunting I saw they had put up brand new signs....
    Curious more than anything...

    As much as I dislike the thought of losing access to a really fun area, I also understand and respect private property rights.
    Taxidermy IS art!
    www.alaskawildliferugs.com
    Your mount is more than a trophy, it's a memory. Relive The Memory!

  • #2
    JuliW,

    Unless something major has just changed ......
    Eklutna has granted an easement to the lake (though I have truthfully never read it).
    Also the Eklutna Inc. boundary extends barely into the lake. You will likely not ever lose access to the KRPUA, Jim Swan wetlands at this point.

    After cleaning up and seeing/documenting garbage and pollutants dumped in those waters and on adjacent lands over the decades - add in the F&G violations, I would not blame Eklutna Inc. for revoking the access (if such is even possible).
    'Property rights' at that entrance have been far, far from respectful, leaving it a miracle 'we' in our worst incarnations can still go there.

    http://dnr.alaska.gov/mlw/krpua/pdf/...landstatus.pdf

    PS - somewhere I have map of better resolution/detail and will post if I get to it.
    "Punish the monkey - let the organ grinder go" - Mark Knopfler

    Comment


    • #3
      [QUOTE=68 Bronco;1441922]JuliW,

      Unless something major has just changed ......
      Eklutna has granted an easement to the lake (though I have truthfully never read it).
      Also the Eklutna Inc. boundary extends barely into the lake. You will likely not ever lose access to the KRPUA, Jim Swan wetlands at this point.

      I believe you will find that Eklutna Inc. didn't grant an easement......It was in place when they took possession of the land from the State.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by sharps5090 View Post

        I believe you will find that Eklutna Inc. didn't grant an easement......It was in place when they took possession of the land from the State.
        Thanks ..!
        "Punish the monkey - let the organ grinder go" - Mark Knopfler

        Comment


        • #5
          Easement Update

          http://www.adn.com/article/20141204/...ation-easement

          Apparently, Eklutna Inc. does yet have a hand in the access. From my perspective, this has potential to be a very good development - more oversight for a valuable, yet long abused area.
          Folks need act respectfully out there.

          Now if DNR and F&G could just stem the tide of machines assaulting anadromous waters they are supposed to be managing in the area ....................

          See USFWS data on the Knik Watershed for in depth info.
          "Punish the monkey - let the organ grinder go" - Mark Knopfler

          Comment


          • #6
            There is a article in the ADN to day about Mud lake.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Big Bend View Post
              There is a article in the ADN to day about Mud lake.
              Correct - link posted here 18 hrs. ago.
              "Punish the monkey - let the organ grinder go" - Mark Knopfler

              Comment


              • #8
                Software changes at the job prevent me from viewing online records at BLM or DNR mapping websites. If I recall correctly the last time I looked at the survey plat of ADL 206989 - the easement for the extension of Maud Road - it showed a leg off to Mud Lake to provide access from the road to the lake shore. This survey was finalized prior to the BLM conveyance of the land to Eklutna/CIRI. I know that the basic data is shown on Status Plat 17N 3E Seward Meridian. I think the actual survey boundaries of ADL 206989 are also located on the master plat for the conveyance survey, but I have no way of seeing the files on the screen or searching it correctly through the BLM's spatial mapping system.

                Since its a public easement that predates their ownership of the land how will they be able to charge a fee for access permits?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just to be clear - I am not privy to the details. All those will be forthcoming, no doubt.
                  "Punish the monkey - let the organ grinder go" - Mark Knopfler

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Found some data on AK DNR site. The easement included on the conveyance deed to Eklutna does not contain a legal discription for a spur off the maud road extension of ADL 206989. Still cannot find a plat of the easement. The BLM conveyance documents are not always complete, but they provide legal standing. Based on this deed Eklutna owns the Mud Lake boat launch. However, tresspass law from the 1890's comes into play since they have allowed public access across their land since day one without control. I see a court battle coming. But if they make improvements and build a boat launch facility with safe parking and outhouse facilities charging a fee is in line with public recreation user systems. If they leave it like it is and charge a fee well, that may not fly.

                    Link to recorders office data. click on the "see image" button in the upper right to see a poor quality scan of the deed and its map. There are three easements within the property. One is Maud Road, the other is a foot trail off the road to Burnt Butte, and the other is the trail along the Knik.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The tresspass laws mentioned above are RS2477 easements? Sort of a muddy area for the State DNR, and they (the State) seem to be a little reluctant to really put some effort in cataloging these existing trails. I guess we'll see, but think this will go to court if anyone opposes the requirement to have (pay) for a permit to access Mud Lake through the existing "boat launch". I think the last couple of sentences below apply here. I think.

                      In general, this statute:
                      * identifies DNR as manager of these routes, unless transferred to DOTPF;
                      * acknowledges that there may be other qualifying routes not yet identified by the project;
                      * indemnifies the state from liability resulting from a person's use of an RS 2477 right-of-way;
                      * outlines procedures and restrictions for vacating RS 2477 rights-of-way.
                      In addition, the legislative act mandated the recordation of the 602 routes listed in the bill as qualifying RS 2477 rights-of-way.
                      The Department of Natural Resources has begun to record the surveyed RS 2477 routes and those crossing large parcels of land held by a single landowner. DNR also notified over 8000 owners of smaller parcels (those within the Fairbanks North Star Borough and Matanuska-Susitna Boroughs) that it was planning to record rights-of-way crossing over their parcels. Public outcry from concerned land owners has curbed those plans. Last year the Department raised concerns about recording unsurveyed RS 2477s across small tracts of land owned by private individuals, and although the Legislature chose not to act on the Department's concerns, Commissioner Shively intends to discuss this issue with the Legislature when it reconvenes next January. The Department does not plan to record routes that cross smaller private parcels this year.
                      **Whether or not an RS 2477 route is recorded, the right-of-way still exists and encumbers the property it crosses. The original RS 2477 route may be re-routed or eradicated only through an easement vacation process. By statute, the Legislature must approve an application to vacate an RS 2477 if no reasonable, comparable alternate right-of-way or means of access exists. However, if an alternate means of access exists, then the state may approve the vacation**.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I welcome improved stewardship at these locations.
                        The list of abuses is long, Very ugly, and well documented - never seen so many stupid people in one concentrated 'recreation' area. What kind of **** fool would dump 26 lead acid auto batteries over the bank in a feeder spring to the lake - just one example of many recorded dirty deeds.
                        Access will remain - chalk it up to 'manifest destiny'.

                        (I do greatly appreciate having access there.)
                        "Punish the monkey - let the organ grinder go" - Mark Knopfler

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by 68 Bronco View Post
                          I welcome improved stewardship at these locations.
                          The list of abuses is long, Very ugly, and well documented - never seen so many stupid people in one concentrated 'recreation' area. What kind of **** fool would dump 26 lead acid auto batteries over the bank in a feeder spring to the lake - just one example of many recorded dirty deeds.
                          I think most agree on this. Amazes me the length some will go to to save a buck. These are the same guys that like to have pallet bonfires in boat lauch parking areas, leaving a pile of nails and broken beer bottles......people with no respect or consideration for anyone but themselves. Pretty common nowadays..

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I wonder who is going to enforce the boat launch permit, same guys who enforce the trespass shooting range 50ft away?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by DAllen View Post
                              I think most agree on this. Amazes me the length some will go to to save a buck. These are the same guys that like to have pallet bonfires in boat lauch parking areas, leaving a pile of nails and broken beer bottles......people with no respect or consideration for anyone but themselves. Pretty common nowadays..


                              i pick up nails and broken beer bottles in campfires all summer long in the knik river beach area where i ride atc. it makes me mad people have so little respect for others, id hate for my kid to get cut playing in the sand or lose a 3 wheeler tire when out riding because of these selfish fools.
                              Semper Fi!

                              Comment

                              Footer Adsense

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X