Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Greenies after the trails in Sutton (this will affect hunting in the area!)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Greenies after the trails in Sutton (this will affect hunting in the area!)

    First post here folks but I thought I'd bring some disturbing news I learned this evening to everyone's attention. It seems the Sutton Community Council is in cahoots with some greenies and they want to turn the trail system in/around Sutton into an Eco Tourism area. I live in Sutton and needless to say am not happy at all with the situation. I guess they didn't get what they wanted at Knik so they've moved up the road to Sutton. From what I understand there has been a multimillion dollar grant awarded and there currently are crews out with GPSs mapping the trails in the area for this greenie push. I for one and not in favor for this and think it needs to be stopped in its tracks.

    Attached is a link to a pdf on the Sutton Community Councils website outlining this greenie vision.

    http://suttoncommunitycouncil.org/wp...s-2.4.2011.pdf

  • #2
    I read the whole thing and saw nothing about hunting.......what actually struck me, is that this would benifit hunting with maintaining acsess and stopping further inroads/fences/pollution.

    Theres ALOT of eco-tourisim in the Arctic, and since Man is a Natural part of the landscape, Hunting is too.

    Cant you be Green and eat meat too?

    OK, prehapse I dont know something ( I actually know nothing at all:topjob.....is there a provision to stop or reduce Hunting when a trail is as gone Green.......????

    Im all for Conservation, not Preservation........
    If you can't Kill it with a 30-06, you should Hide.:topjob:

    "Dam it all", The Beaver told me.....

    Comment


    • #3
      Agreed the pdf says nothing about hunting. However, per one of the community council members opposed to this they have hunting squarely in their sights. Regardless of whether they're directly after hunting or not I just can't see eco tourism and hunting co-existing peacefully.

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, DSave , as a Hunter, I reccomend that you show those Greenies just how it Really is, and that a Man in his habitat is the apex predator

        Give 'em the truth weather they like it or not.:topjob:
        If you can't Kill it with a 30-06, you should Hide.:topjob:

        "Dam it all", The Beaver told me.....

        Comment


        • #5
          Dave,

          Is this document (proposal draft I assume), a response to the Wishbone Hill Coal Mine?
          My only gear sponsor is the salvation army - Dick Griffith

          Comment


          • #6
            I'm sorry that thing just reeks of anti-hunting. Just the use of the word "green" is enough to raise alarms.

            Comment


            • #7
              I'm not sure if it's a response to the Wishbone Hill Mine Project or if they're just trying in Sutton what they failed to achieve at Knik/Jim Creek. The way I understand the current situation is 1) the Sutton Community Council has "postponed" any action on the matter 2) The outside group pushing this is continuing on laying the groundwork by mapping any and all trails in the area to include those on private property in an attempt to have the state recognize them as "public access" trails. After that is done the push will be made to ban any and all motorized use of the trails.

              Comment


              • #8
                To be brutally honest they've already ruined the Anchorage bowl with their west coast wanna be utopia and I for one am not interested in them bringing their attitudes and lifestyle to the valley. We moved from Anchorage to Wasilla and now to Sutton to get away from those types.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Did this committee happen to at least get the Sutton sign with the strategically placed "L" removed?

                  As far as the wishbone lake they have this awfully worded poll.

                  Do you think the Sutton Community Council should take a stand on the Wishbone Hill Coal Project?
                  It is obvious that they have a unilateral thought process because they think this is a yes or no question when it actually doesn't say what sort of a stand they are taking! There are two sides to the issue that one could "take a stand" on, for or against, but they don't seem to recognize that. It is funny because most of the time the folks with agenda's like these actually see themselves as somehow more "intelligent" than those of us who work hard and ride ATV's or hunt. They are so narrow minded that they can't grasp why someone would not agree with their viewpoint and the only thing that they can attribute it too is that the opposition must be stupid or incompetent.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    They may not mention hunting but here's a clue to their "agenda:"

                    Protect air, water, wildlife and land quality while reducing impacts to nearby properties
                    from traffic, noise, pollution, lighting, etc.
                    Protect recreation opportunities and enhance quality of life for Sutton residents
                    Identify, protect and enhance the quantity and quality of the community's watersheds
                    and groundwater; prevent degradation offish and wildlife habitat, vegetation and clean
                    air resources.


                    Just the first statement tells me they want to not allow motorized access and cease hunting. "Reduce impact from traffic, NOISE, etc...

                    Reducing impact, would mean restricting access and hunting. Fancy terms like reduce and protect mean "eliminate and abolish" in greeneological terms in reference to hunting and motorized access. What authority does the Sutton Community Council have in actually implementing this on state land? Gotta continue to fist-fight any and all of the green agenda before we become Alaskafornia.

                    Tim

                    Tim

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by tccak71 View Post
                      Just the first statement tells me they want to not allow motorized access and cease hunting. "Reduce impact from traffic, NOISE, etc...

                      Reducing impact, would mean restricting access and hunting. Fancy terms like reduce and protect mean "eliminate and abolish" in greeneological terms in reference to hunting and motorized access. What authority does the Sutton Community Council have in actually implementing this on state land? Gotta continue to fist-fight any and all of the green agenda before we become Alaskafornia.

                      Tim

                      Tim
                      "greeneological": love it. Adding it to my lexicon.
                      It doesn't take long after they arrive for those folks to start dictating how things should be does it?
                      In my observation, they come up as tourists, fall in love with some part of Alaska, move here, then start agitating to make it like wherever they came from, gerally with complete disregard for whoever already lives there.
                      I try to not hate anybody, but my feelings about these folks isn't ranked too high above thieves.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        You put a frog in boiling water and he will jump out. You put him in cold water, and slowly warm it up, he'll sit there and boil to death.

                        The lesson: You let these greenies have a bit now, and they'll surely expand on it, killing any hunting or outdoors recreation that includes rifles, fishing poles, ATV's or archery.

                        Oppose it NOW.
                        "Ya can't stop a bad guy with a middle finger and a bag of quarters!!!!"- Ted Nugent.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by pike_palace View Post
                          You put a frog in boiling water and he will jump out. You put him in cold water, and slowly warm it up, he'll sit there and boil to death.

                          The lesson: You let these greenies have a bit now, and they'll surely expand on it, killing any hunting or outdoors recreation that includes rifles, fishing poles, ATV's or archery.

                          Oppose it NOW.
                          That is true. They work through slow, careful social change: a little at a time, incremental changes so as not to over-alarm the old guard. Give them an inch, and they will eventually take a mile.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Once these kind of people get one thing they want then they push harder. First its trails then you cant ride your atv then you cant hunt then you cant carry a gun. Just look at whats happening on the west coast (Cali, oregon, washington). Every year theres another place you cant hunt or ride your atv cause of these people. Theres million places you can go hike who needs trails. They need to get out of there house that was built out of wood from the trees they dont want to cut down and there car that polutes the air and hike where theres no trails.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              So, Dave-n-AK, what's up? When do they meet? Will they accept public comments? Can we call, email, tar & feather anyone to prevent this hostile takeover?

                              Tim

                              Comment

                              Footer Adsense

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X