Mountain rifle cartridge??

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HuntKodiak
    replied
    Jake, do you walk in circles because one shoulder is set farther back than the other?

    6.5lb .416 :shot:

    ouch

    Leave a comment:


  • icb12
    replied
    .260 remington

    Leave a comment:


  • BRWNBR
    replied
    ya i remember you sayin' that several times over while you had it....

    Leave a comment:


  • Alaska_Lanche
    replied
    Originally posted by BRWNBR View Post
    my .416 is 6.5lbs or so...
    I knew there was a reason I hoped we didn't see anything for me to shoot with your rifle on the goat hunt.

    Leave a comment:


  • BRWNBR
    replied
    love the .270 win and the .30-'06 probably more than any other calibers...for personal hunting. most short mags i see are a little lighter than factory long actions..but most fail to take full advantage of the ability to get them as light as possible..
    you can get a .270 win just about as light as a .270 short if you build the gun right...my .416 is 6.5lbs or so...my .270 is about the same, .30-'06 is around 8lbs and i'd give anything (except money... ) to knock about 2lbs off of it...

    Leave a comment:


  • nittanytbone
    replied
    Originally posted by LuJon View Post
    I thought hard about a 7-08 for my next mountain rifle. The longer I looked the more I realized that it doesn't seem to offer any advantage over the good old 308, in fact there were more drawbacks than advantages when put side by side. Most of the negligable but still... Same spec rifle the 7mm will weigh slightly more, the ammo costs a little more, the range of bullet weights is smaller and lighter while not being any faster, at least according to the load data I found. My hodgdon book puts the 308 tossing 165's at about the same speed that the 7-08 will toss 145's.
    That's what I found when doing research, and I ended up with a 308 as well...

    The short magnums are the only other thing I'd consider. The 300 is certainly a solid choice and one I thought about too. I think for a light handy rifle you want to cut ounces as much as possible, so that means short actions. That also implies to me accepting the best acceptable choice with the least recoil. If you think you need to take the longer shots, then by all means, go for the short magnum -- but if not, why not go for something that's going to kick a little less in a lighter rifle with a shorter barrel?

    Leave a comment:


  • LuJon
    replied
    Originally posted by wildone View Post
    A 7mm-08 and 120 or 140 barnes is hard to beat for a mountain rig JMHO. Short action non magnum and premium bullets. It saves you weight in the action and barrel no need to go more that a 36 mm objective on glass max. Could never figure out why guys build an ultralight and then throw a hubble telescope on it , kinda defeats the purpose. Something between 5.5 and 6 lbs all up is easy to carry and still balances well when it come time to go to work. The 7 's have sheep and goat written all over em. good luck what ever you decide.
    I thought hard about a 7-08 for my next mountain rifle. The longer I looked the more I realized that it doesn't seem to offer any advantage over the good old 308, in fact there were more drawbacks than advantages when put side by side. Most of the negligable but still... Same spec rifle the 7mm will weigh slightly more, the ammo costs a little more, the range of bullet weights is smaller and lighter while not being any faster, at least according to the load data I found. My hodgdon book puts the 308 tossing 165's at about the same speed that the 7-08 will toss 145's.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alaskan22
    replied
    I'm not looking for a caliber or gun. Got both picked out. Just figured everyone could share their preference and reasoning.

    Leave a comment:


  • .338WM
    replied
    Everything big game I have taken was with either a .30-06',a .338WM. and the latest moose with a .58cal black powder rifle. Now I have a .45-70Govt. I want to get experience on. I have other calibers/rifles but they have not made into the field for big game though my .243Win may get some blood on it before all is done.

    Leave a comment:


  • FurFishGame
    replied
    Of course, a 450 nitro would be more sufficient for bear, a 300 might not kill it very well:shot:

    Leave a comment:


  • brav01
    replied
    Last I heard sheep were wearing body armour this year; I'ld consider a 378 Weatherby Mag. minimum. Pretty fast with a big bullet for less wind deviation. Might as well put a 8x24x56mm scope on it so you can spot them as well.

    Leave a comment:


  • sdrhunter
    replied
    i like the short actions for weight purposes: 270 wsm, 7mm SAUM, 300 wsm
    long actions when weight isn't as much of a priority: 280AI, 300 RUM, 7mm RUM, 338 edge, 30 or 338-378.

    Leave a comment:


  • knikglacier
    replied
    You have picked a very good caliber. Now you need to find a new Kimber Montana, buy some Talley Lightweights and get a reasonably powered scope, say a 3.5-10x40 and you are set. If you are a hand loader, I'd pick the 180gr Nosler Partition as my go-to bullet. Good luck.

    Leave a comment:


  • mainer_in_ak
    replied
    Originally posted by Alaskan22 View Post
    Yup...another one of these threads, except this one is more of a personal preference and why.
    I've got my caliber locked in, so this is basically just new info and a good source for others.

    Before I settled in on the 300WSM (flat shooting ballistics, good bullet choice for a non-reloader, and we miiiiight see some bears in Kodiak), I was mulling over a 257 Robers, or maybe a 270 WSM.




    Heavy bullets (less wind play)?
    Light (4000fps)?
    flat shooting?
    bigger caliber (bears in the area)?
    smaller caliber (sheep are easy to kill)?
    My picks for Alaska:

    358 winchester
    338 federal
    338-06
    35 whelen
    325 wsm
    338 Ruger compact magnum

    A nice long range accubond sighted for the scope (good for 400 yd shots),
    And then a nice big heavy for caliber bullet sighted into the open sights of that nice 20 inch barreled carbine during the hike/float out with all that bloody goat or sheep meat on your back or in your raft.
    What is your gun caliber of choice?

    I don't hunt sheep, but I sure have hiked around the mountains, and glaciers with a rifle in hand......oops......it was a 358 winchester.

    Leave a comment:


  • kloshe
    replied
    My vote goes to the 300wsm for a mountain rifle. it won't do anything a 300winmag can't, but it does do it in a shorter barrel, smaller action, and therefore a lighter rifle. I also think any rifle carried should give a hunter a level of comfort against bear troubles, which a 300wsm does with a good bullet. That doesn't mean a 270, 25.06, or 7mm-08 won't kill a brown bear, i just feel more comfortable with a 300wsm.

    Leave a comment:

Footer Adsense

Collapse
Working...
X