Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nick Jans Group In Kenai

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Nick Jans Group In Kenai

    I was contacted this morning by a person wanting to come to my workplace and have me sign a petition about ariel wolf and bear control. I remembered the discussion here a while back and did some research. This is Nick Jans group. They sure are deceitful in the way they present it. He is suppose to call me back this afternoon to see if he can come over.
    "Everything that lives and moves will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything."

  • #2
    Invite him over.
    Politely explain your reason for not signing his petition.
    At least while he is at your house he wont be at someone elses.
    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    www.arcticconcealment.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Agenda

      Originally posted by blackfoot View Post
      I was contacted this morning by a person wanting to come to my workplace and have me sign a petition about ariel wolf and bear control. I remembered the discussion here a while back and did some research. This is Nick Jans group. They sure are deceitful in the way they present it. He is suppose to call me back this afternoon to see if he can come over.

      It's a shame you can hardly get a straight scoop on anything now a days, always skewed by the agenda and the money or interest behind that agenda.

      It's a shame that this sort of mentality is the norm and really shapes our hunting policies.
      Marc Theiler

      Comment


      • #4
        Petitions..

        I was approached a couple of weeks ago at the Loussac Library in Anchorage. What a waste of time. I told the guy I was for wolf/bear control and I had hoped to see the program continued.

        Tim

        Comment


        • #5
          I used to really emjoy Nicks articles in Alaska magazine but ever since he married that greenie gal from back east he has gone off the deep end. Its to bad because he ahd the talent and related some great stories of life in the bush. akraven

          Comment


          • #6
            In defense of Nick

            Nick was and I think still is a pretty motivated hunter.
            He used a 243 to hunt everything from dall sheep to grizzly bears.
            I remember that he made it a point to chase after wolves with a snowmachine.
            I just can't see him advocating anti-hunting stuff.

            Comment


            • #7
              Nick Jans on a plane

              I once met Nick Jans on a trip from Anchorage to Juneau. I opened "Grizzly Maze" and started to read it. I had borrowed the copy from a friend. This guy sitting next to me leans over and says "that is a real #$% book." I though, oh boy another lame book and asked if he had read it. He said, "I wrote it." We had a lengthy discussion on Timothy Treadwell and the events that transpired around his death. After speaking with Jans for a little over an hour I learned a few things about him. He is an interesting person to talk with and he has some pretty neat experiences. I like to talk to people and get their story so it was an easy discussion. He did some guiding while in the bush and is not very proud of the time he spent guiding. I didn't get the imipression that he was against hunting, he just saw a lot of things that made him sick. I can understand as we have discussed law enforcement officers on this forum that there are always the 10% people. As an avid hunter myself I feel we may have some higher percentages than 10%. It amazes me what people will do when hunting and not think twice about it. There are ethics in hunting and everyone has their own. Jans never spoke to me about his "followers" and I hadn't heard anything until here. I could understand his frustration with some hunters and some guides through his personal experiences. I am not being sympathetic to his cause just saying what I think from speaking with him face to face.

              As for me talking with him didn't make me think I was slaughtering animals it just made me put more value on the animals I do hunt.

              Comment


              • #8
                Deciet

                Even if I don't agree with a petition, I can respect somebody for trying to do what they believe in. The problem I have with this is the deceitful tactics used. The caller very much tried to make it sound like this was a pro predator control petition. We all know that if Fish and Game personnel are the only ones authorized to shoot, it will kill the program. Whether you are for or against the predator control program is not the issue, it is the deciet with which they are trying to push their agenda.
                "Everything that lives and moves will be food for you. Just as I gave you the green plants, I now give you everything."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Just for the record I'm for the wolf and bear control. And if memory serves me Tony knowles is not.
                  goldbelt

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    question for goldbelt

                    Goldbelt,

                    Would you be for any wolf and bear control programs if they went against the recommendations of the seasoned area biologist for that unit?
                    Mark Richards
                    www.residenthuntersofalaska.org

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Bushrat,are you asking as if the "area" doesn't need to be "under controll" or that there is a "better" way to "controll"?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Steve,

                        I was just wondering if goldbelt was in favor of following the recommendations of the seasoned area biologist of a particular unit. Say, for instance, the area bio recommends 'moderate' reductions of wolves and/or bears in a certain area, yet the control program expands over tens of thousands of square miles and encompasses 'strong' reductions of both species. Still in favor of it? Should we rely on the recommendations of experienced area biologists moreso that we do the recommendations of Advisory Committees and hunters?
                        Mark Richards
                        www.residenthuntersofalaska.org

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Good question.I would think that the controll program that we have in place focuses on the job at hand.Say,in unit13 which is very large,the state says that an "x" number of wolves need to be taken to help the WHOLE unit's caribou and moose numbers rebound.And iwould like to trap some of those wolves around Glennallen but the numbr of wolves in this area is low but in Cantwell(still unit 13)the wolf numbers are very high.I wouldn't have a problem with the state proceeding in thinning out the wolves in Cantwell even know that will probably even lesson my chances of being able to trap them in Glennallen.Hope that made sense,lol.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Steve,

                            Thanks for saying it's a good question. Only problem is, you didn't answer it <grin>.
                            Mark Richards
                            www.residenthuntersofalaska.org

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Bushrat,doesn't the state take information from both the advisory commitie's AND the biologists to come up with quota numbers,season's,and borders in the units for the controll program?

                              Comment

                              Footer Adsense

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X