Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Transporter & hunters fined in SE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Transporter & hunters fined in SE

    http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/rural...ry/700125.html

    Looks like it was about the money! Kudo's to Trooper Baum, a former Kenai River guide!

  • #2
    Above the law

    One more reason why a person should obey the law.

    A game warden and an officer......wow!

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by yukon View Post
      http://www.adn.com/news/alaska/rural...ry/700125.html

      Looks like it was about the money! Kudo's to Trooper Baum, a former Kenai River guide!
      Trooper Baum is now a Ketchikan boy and is quite the standup guy. Definitely kudos to him.
      Vegetables aren’t food, vegetables are what food eats.

      Comment


      • #4
        If they had the meat on the boat already why not just give it to the needy insted of dumping it. Hope the hunters lose big time also.
        Now left only to be a turd in the forrest and the circle will be complete.Use me as I have used you

        Comment


        • #5
          I agree. It's hard to understand, why they'd get rid of the bears after they already had them on the boat. It's not like they had to haul it off a mountain or anything....they shot them on the beach!!!

          Comment


          • #6
            What?!

            double post
            Last edited by 270ti; 02-24-2009, 21:44. Reason: double post
            Alaska Wide Open Charters
            www.alaskawideopen.com
            907-965-0130

            Comment


            • #7
              What?!

              I think that the transporter is being unfairly targeted/fined in this case, from what I have read in the ADN. (they might have the story all screwed up) A transporters job is to take the hunters from point A to point B. No hunting assistance is allowed. Why do they refer to him as a "guide"? Why should the transporter be fined 10k and the hunters be allowed to get a reduced charge? The transporter wasn't on the beach with them! How is a transporter accountable for hunter he's NOT guiding?

              If the transporter had gone to the beach to retrieve the meat for the hunters or make sure they were being legal, I'm sure he would have been charged with "Illegal guiding"...
              Alaska Wide Open Charters
              www.alaskawideopen.com
              907-965-0130

              Comment


              • #8
                Rules

                If you see someone poaching do you report them?
                If I relied on the income I don't think the tip would have been big enough.
                Justice served.

                Comment


                • #9
                  So you think it's fair for a guy who isn't guiding, to be fined 10k and loose his business for 3 years (who knows the actual cost of that) for not reporting someone else breaking the law?

                  I'm not saying the guy is innocent, but the punishment seems excessive.
                  Alaska Wide Open Charters
                  www.alaskawideopen.com
                  907-965-0130

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    As I read it right....The transporter was sited for failing to report a crime. He was aware of the dates involving necessary meat recover-salvaged, and when the meat did not need to be salvaged. He had game pelts on his transporter boat, but not the meat on a day that required both. That is illegal for the transporter unless he reports it. Then when he did not immediate report the failure to salvage issue, that is a second violation.

                    If I were to speculate, which is always difficult to do, I would predict that the troopers suspected prior incidences of these violation and targeted the area and perhaps even that Transporter service.

                    They, the shooters and the boat transsporter, were not cited until the three lied to the troopers about the specific kill date.

                    People make errors. This appears to have been preventable by simply salvaging the bear meat, and properly tagging the bear pelts legally. Just like you and I do.

                    Dennis
                    AK TAGS
                    Imagine (It's easy if you try)
                    …miles and miles of mountains…wide expanses of tundra...remote wild waters…
                    (Whisper words of wisdom) Let It Be

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      They were wrong

                      I can understand fining the transporter but it seems that this case is backwards and the powers at be were harder on the transporter than the guity poachers. Allowing them to plead guilty to a lesser charge and testify against the guy that was giving them a ride is BS. The transporter is the one that should have gotten the deal
                      Semper Fi and God Bless

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        common

                        tboehm,
                        I agree that it seems inappropriate to offer the lesser charge to the hunters, in order to obtain greater evidence against the professional transporter. It is also commonly, routinely done.
                        Lets all be legal and careful out there where nobody is lookin....

                        Dennis
                        Imagine (It's easy if you try)
                        …miles and miles of mountains…wide expanses of tundra...remote wild waters…
                        (Whisper words of wisdom) Let It Be

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Makes sense

                          The hunters will probably never be back. The transporter may operate again in the future. In addition all the other transporters in the state see what happened and may do the right thing next time. The state is getting the most possible prevention against future issues like this. All the transporter had to do was to tell them to keep the meat until they were back at the dock and out of his business. Or he could have been truthful to the troopers when they asked. I believe he could have been charged with obstruction of justice and lying to an investigator as well.
                          I wonder what kind of issues the retired game warden will have from this. I bet he has been kicking himself every day for his stupidity. They should have waited another day before hunting if they wanted to stay legal. Maybe it is karma. I wonder if people in his home town know about his crime.:confused:

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            "Stupid" actions....

                            For shame, a former game warden AND a former military officer? Hmm, does that explain the state of the country we live in?? And, the transporter KNEW they were in violation...
                            All together now, S-T-U-P-I-D.
                            They should be on "American's Stupidist Hunting Videos"...why tranport the carcasses back to the beach? Could have just fed the fishes in lieu of the land critters...
                            They ALL should have had the book thrown at them. For all those who are legal and law abiding, what a complete utter waste...
                            Wonder how many extra deer, ducks and fish they've wasted all their years of hunting/fishing? I say give them all cement shoes and let's chum for salmon sharks...HAH!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              It's the law.

                              Originally posted by 270ti View Post
                              I think that the transporter is being unfairly targeted/fined in this case, from what I have read in the ADN. (they might have the story all screwed up) A transporters job is to take the hunters from point A to point B. No hunting assistance is allowed. Why do they refer to him as a "guide"? Why should the transporter be fined 10k and the hunters be allowed to get a reduced charge? The transporter wasn't on the beach with them! How is a transporter accountable for hunter he's NOT guiding?

                              If the transporter had gone to the beach to retrieve the meat for the hunters or make sure they were being legal, I'm sure he would have been charged with "Illegal guiding"...
                              My research may not be perfect, but AK statutes say"

                              AS 08.54.740. Responsibility of Guide or Transporter For Violations.

                              (b) A transporter who provides transportation services is equally responsible under AS 08.54.710 for a violation of a state or federal wildlife or game, guiding, or transportation services statute or regulation committed by a person while in the course of the person's employment for the transporter.When I dug deeper AS 08.54.710 talks about holding a hearing to determine if the game laws were violated and can then impose sanctions against the transporter. Just like we have to know the laws to hunt, the transporter has to know the laws to provide his services as well, and he has to know when they're being broken.

                              V/R

                              Fuse

                              Comment

                              Footer Adsense

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X