Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AKSCI Response to Anchorage AC Antlerless Moose

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AKSCI Response to Anchorage AC Antlerless Moose

    Alaska Chapter SCI
    PO Box 770511
    Eagle River, AK 99577
    (907) 980-9018
    November 30, 2014


    Dear Mr. Doner:

    I am writing as an Anchorage resident, avid outdoorsman, and president of the Alaska Chapter of Safari Club International (AKSCI). On behalf of SCI Alaska Chapter and myself I am writing over concerns raised by the November 28, 2014 article in the Alaska Dispatch News titled ďAnchorage Fish and Game Advisory Committee Cancels Local Moose HuntsĒ.

    Iím concerned about the effects this decision may have on our outdoor community as well as our communityís safety. Negative human-moose interactions in the Anchorage bowl are a serious problem. Motor vehicle accidents, encounters by recreationalists in our green belts, and encounters at our very residences are a serious matter. This is Alaska and a certain amount of wildlife interaction should be expected, but we should also support sound sustainable wildlife management practices to the greatest extent possible.

    Managing Anchorageís moose populations by providing antlerless hunts should be encouraged as long as it is sustainable. This is especially so when it provides desired recreational and subsistence opportunities for Alaska residents. Science, research, and the expertise of our local AKF&G biologists suggest that the continuation of antlerless moose hunts in the Anchorage bowl is not only sustainable, but is a great tool for managing our healthy Anchorage moose population.

    This decision will cancel several hunts, specifically for wounded veterans and hunts for restricted weapons. The restricted weapons hunts are a great opportunity for archery, muzzleloader, and shotgun enthusiasts to have a permit for their chosen weapon. Those opportunities promote archery and traditional weapons use, which is essential for their growth and perpetuation.

    I would like to thank you for discussing this issue with me and am interested in hearing more before a final decision is made. I would especially like to see the science, population surveys, and public testimony that back this decision. Iím encouraging all Alaska Chapter SCI members as well as the outdoor community to attend the December 2nd meeting at 6:30pm at the King Career Center to voice their concerns regarding this decision.

    Sincerely,


    Dr. Brett A. Barringer
    SCI AK Chapter President

    cc: Anchorage Advisory Committee Members

  • #2
    Brett, how did the AC elections go in light of SCI's push to get members out to the election with their list of vetted candidates? Did the candidates that SCI supported get elected? If so, was their view of anterless hunts not part of the equation?

    Thanks for writing this letter. Let us know if and how the AC members respond.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Brian M View Post
      Brett, how did the AC elections go in light of SCI's push to get members out to the election with their list of vetted candidates? Did the candidates that SCI supported get elected? If so, was their view of anterless hunts not part of the equation?

      Thanks for writing this letter. Let us know if and how the AC members respond.
      Brian,

      The people we supported were elected. To be honest Iím not sure how much the antlerless issue was in the equation. As I stated in another thread we will be looking at revamping the recommendation/mobilization process for future Anchorage AC elections. I really think we need to do a better job vetting candidates as well as looking at other candidates and also mobilizing people to participate in the process in a thoughtful manner rather than mindless rubber stamping. I will be at the meeting tuesday and Iíve been told the AKF&G biologists will also be present. It should be informative.

      Brett

      Comment


      • #4
        The rub is the ADFG doesn't have a good population estimate of moose for 14C. The AC board wanted more information to make a better, more informed decision other than"that's the way we've always done it", regarding number of permits to be issued.

        Accurate moose pop counts are prob low on ADFG list for 14 C, hence the fireworks.

        The hunt is not canceled yet, and prob won't be. The AC is one of the checks of the system to ensure sustainability. They just want ADFG to be honest with their information/survey results and adjust the tags accordingly.

        Look back in the forum posts and threads about these hunts. More tag winners have had and increasingly hard time filling them. Is it less moose, areas of higher moose density not being accessed due to closure, moose altering their habits and are not in hunt areas during the open seasons? These are what the AC is curious about before they just rubber stamp the same ol'.

        See you tomorrow for more of the fireworks show.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by dieNqvrs View Post
          The rub is the ADFG doesn't have a good population estimate of moose for 14C. The AC board wanted more information to make a better, more informed decision other than"that's the way we've always done it", regarding number of permits to be issued.
          If they wanted some more information, maybe the should have not told the biologist to stay away from their meeting as stated in the story. According to the report, he asked whether he should be there and was told to not bother. Seems if a group actually wanted more information, they would have asked those kinds of people to be there to explain it to them rather than tell them to stay home and make decisions about it uninformed.

          Comment


          • #6
            The biologist will be there tomorrow, so I think it should be an informative evening.

            Brett

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by anchskier View Post
              According to the report, he asked whether he should be there and was told to not bother.
              He is actually a She. And she will be attending from what is been told as
              well.

              This story is meant to sell papers not tell the truth, it is what the media does, stir the pot.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by BrettAKSCI View Post
                Brian,

                The people we supported were elected. To be honest Iím not sure how much the antlerless issue was in the equation. As I stated in another thread we will be looking at revamping the recommendation/mobilization process for future Anchorage AC elections. I really think we need to do a better job vetting candidates as well as looking at other candidates and also mobilizing people to participate in the process in a thoughtful manner rather than mindless rubber stamping. I will be at the meeting tuesday and Iíve been told the AKF&G biologists will also be present. It should be informative.

                Brett
                From the outside, it appears Steve Flory develops the list of SCI approved candidates and gets them elected. I was told that the last bunch elected did not want to participate in any committees, they were there basically to keep other candidates from being elected. Makes sense they would back Flory on this when he got them elected. If you are serious about getting better candidates, perhaps you should disassociate your organization from Flory.

                I am curious how much consideration ADFG, BOF and BOG give to the Anchorage AC on most issues.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by dieNqvrs View Post
                  He is actually a She. And she will be attending from what is been told as
                  well.

                  This story is meant to sell papers not tell the truth, it is what the media does, stir the pot.
                  I'm glad they will be attending the next meeting. I was referring to the meeting the story was about, where Dave Battle, the Assistant Area Biologist was told not to attend. And unless Dave Battle got an operation, I believe HE is still a he.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Never again will I blindly follow an SCI list again or recommendation. If I had known Flory was involved I would have voted for anyone who would get him out. I now know to question everything they may send my way. I really liked SCI, now I am even rethinking attending their February banquet.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by polardds View Post
                      Never again will I blindly follow an SCI list again or recommendation. If I had known Flory was involved I would have voted for anyone who would get him out. I now know to question everything they may send my way. I really liked SCI, now I am even rethinking attending their February banquet.
                      I wouldnít be throwing in the towel just yet. Steve Flory in no way pulls the strings at AKSCI.

                      Brett

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by polardds View Post
                        Never again will I blindly follow an SCI list again or recommendation. If I had known Flory was involved I would have voted for anyone who would get him out. I now know to question everything they may send my way. I really liked SCI, now I am even rethinking attending their February banquet.
                        Definitely an interesting situation worth noting how it plays out...


                        Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by BrettAKSCI View Post
                          I wouldnít be throwing in the towel just yet. Steve Flory in no way pulls the strings at AKSCI.

                          Brett
                          Based in what I heard about the meeting last night AKSCI supported a bunch of candidates that aren't fit for the job. What do you plan to do differently next year?

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Apparently Neal DeWitt made a statement that he believes that cows should never be killed. Can you please comment on that?

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              SCI supporting non-trophy hunt?

                              Comment

                              Footer Adsense

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X