Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Is author Jim Rearden (Alaska's Wolf Man) an "Anti"?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Is author Jim Rearden (Alaska's Wolf Man) an "Anti"?

    In a discussion on the fisheries mgmt forum a member here called Jim Rearden an "anti":
    Originally posted by Akres
    He [Jim Rearden] started out like most...full of p and v...as he aged his mind started slipping...you could watch it happening in his works. Same way most hunters become over time. Completely understandable and I don't blame him for his condition...But honestly in the end...Yes...Very Anti...It is good to point this type thing as it seems to creep into our society without most realizing it..
    Softie's is what I call them...Soft Anti's...he grew Soft over time, as he sat around in his cubicle heated by Natural Gas...When someone else was paying for it. Really easy for his type to cry about development and yet make his living off others toil...Of all the books and articles I have read of him...not once do I recall him having a job and puttting in an honest day.
    This opinion above stemmed from this op-ed by Jim Rearden:
    http://www.adn.com/2011/04/21/v-prin...etter-bet.html

    We can agree or disagree on numerous issues related to hunting and fishing and development. But it takes the cake really when some use the "Anti" label (and go even farther to denigrate someone) on a fellow hunter and longtime Alaskan just because they don't agree with him.

    So what say you all, is Jim Rearden what the AOD member quoted above says he is because he penned that op-ed?
    Mark Richards
    www.residenthuntersofalaska.org

  • #2
    Originally posted by bushrat View Post
    So what say you all, is Jim Rearden what the AOD member quoted above says he is because he penned that op-ed?
    Sounds to me like he's concerned about Alaska's resources in the long run.

    Comment


    • #3
      Wasnt Jim Rearden the author and Glaser the 'Hunter'?

      Hope I dont become like "most hunters over time"...........

      A pretty cool fellow once quipp'd

      "I yam wats I yam, and dat's all dat I yam!"
      If you can't Kill it with a 30-06, you should Hide.:topjob:

      "Dam it all", The Beaver told me.....

      Comment


      • #4
        Maby , Familyman, you have hit the dot.......maby he is aware of the Great Southern Kill aproaching.............People everywhere, canned hunts, Leases, hunting teams, Blaaaa , blaaaaa, blaaaa.....

        Im gonna have nightmares tonight.....
        If you can't Kill it with a 30-06, you should Hide.:topjob:

        "Dam it all", The Beaver told me.....

        Comment


        • #5
          Alaska is the land and critters on the land and in the waters not the people anymore. Many can see a day when folks comming to Alaska might well say,heck it looks like LA
          Now left only to be a turd in the forrest and the circle will be complete.Use me as I have used you

          Comment


          • #6
            anti's

            The real anti's are those who would destroy habitat in the name of profit, disguised as progress. That they turn it around and decry those who shine a light on the destruction as anti's is ironic at the least and bizarre at the worst. That hunters and fishermen buy this and parrot it is mind boggling. Without habitat, what do hunters and fishermen have left?

            An anti is someone who is against an activity such as hunting and fishing, like a PETA member. How that label got stuck to people who are for protecting habitat is beyond me.

            But what do you call someone who claims to be a hunter or fisherman but pushes for a project that causes massive habitat destruction? Do you think it was PETA types (the actual antis) who ruined the great salmon runs on the Columbia River? (The best king salmom producing system in the world before dams were built, runs in the millions) Or was it the people who decided to build the dams and salmon be ****ed because "we need cheap power and irrigation."

            It won't be antis who bring about the demise of hunting and fishing. It will be the lack of fish and game and places to hunt and fish them. And calling people who protest the destruction of that needed habitat "antis" will hasten the day when hunting and fishing will only be practiced in history books or in limited "farm type" situations where you pay to pretend you are still a hunter/gatherer.

            Any hunter or fisherman who doesn't lean to the green side is a fool.
            An opinion should be the result of thought, not a substitute for it.
            - Jef Mallett

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Amigo Will View Post
              Alaska is the land and critters on the land and in the waters not the people anymore. Many can see a day when folks comming to Alaska might well say,heck it looks like LA
              Well stated...........Rep point sent.
              ALASKA is a "HARD COUNTRY for OLDMEN". (But if you live it wide'ass open, it is a delightful place to finally just sit-back and savor those memories while sipping Tequila).

              Comment


              • #8
                While I haven't read that thread- there is only so much of Akres's/ Bushrat's point and counterpoint I can take after all- the leap of logic required to brand Rearden an "anti" is simply fantastical.

                To throw that word out there so freely either shows someone's unfamiliarity with who "real antis" are or a complete disrespect for other points of view essential to living in a democratic republic. To say that he's soft or that writing isn't an "honest day's work" is just sloppy debate tactics- if you can't best the facts, beat the man.

                I've got to say that of late the tone of some of these conversations has gotten bad...a lot of name calling simply because folks don't align with someone's very narrow bandwidth of thought. That's not the way the country is supposed to work. On any issue there should be the extreme ends having few folks with the bulk of the people in the middle- thinking for themselves. Now that our society lets others do their thinking for them- the extreme ends are chock full towing a surprisingly identical line while the thinking middle is dwindling. I think we'd all be better off if we turned off MSN/FOX News and picked up a good book or two. The polarization of our nation over the last twenty years is amazing...and disturbing.

                Rearden an "anti"? - in a pig's eye.
                "I do not deal in hypotheticals. The world, as it is, is vexing enough..." Col. Stonehill, True Grit

                Comment


                • #9
                  I have known Jim Rearden for years. I once took an extended trip up the Wood River Lakes system with him. He is not an "anti", he just has strong opinions. Just like other old time Alaskans, who are in the know about wildlife issues, are on both sides of the bear baiting controversy.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by bushrat View Post
                    In a discussion on the fisheries mgmt forum a member here called Jim Rearden an "anti":


                    So what say you all, is Jim Rearden what the AOD member quoted above says he is because he penned that op-ed?
                    [/SIZE][/FONT]
                    On this FORUM if you don't agree with someone you call them a "Troll" or an "Anti". If one studies logic in English Composition, it is called: "Bandwagon" logic. It is the lowest level of invalid logic. Jim Rearden, was doing what most on this forum only can dream of, and he was doing it befor their daddy was born. Sad really, very sad.
                    ALASKA is a "HARD COUNTRY for OLDMEN". (But if you live it wide'ass open, it is a delightful place to finally just sit-back and savor those memories while sipping Tequila).

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      It is all too convienent to cherry pick a single comment from an entire thread and use it in a different context....
                      But in an effort to further this discussion, I would offer up additional thought. Old timers had their moment in the sun...they did their dead level best with what they had to work with. Rearden grew up and formulated his though process' and agenda in an Alaska far different from today...technologically speaking. His was a time when everything was calculated with a stubby pencil and speculation. A time before man landed on the moon, created computers and embraced engineering as a way to the future.
                      He like all the others that have come before us, worked with what they had....

                      To think that his workings will suffice today in the challenges that face Alaskan's is ludicrous...I repeat...ludicrous. Sure it makes for great winter time fun to sit around the fire and read of his and their exploits, but we must surely recognize their efforts for what they were...not what they are. We must look to the future...using their example and OUR tools...

                      Do I differ from his opinion and thought process'....YOU BET!!! Do I believe Alaskan's can develop our resources in responsible manner? YOU BET!!!
                      Do I think there are some content to sit around in a cabin, huddled around a wood stove, wearing animal skins for clothes, weaving baskets for trade and typing nonsense on a computer? YOU BET!!! And...I think that is Good for THAT person...but BAD..very BAD for the future if Alaskan's collectively decide to choose this lifestyle.
                      But I would not fault a parent one ioda if they choose to train their kids in this manner and bring 'em up that way...It is a personal choice. Choose Wisely!!! We can use these new technologies, super computers and mans manchines to our benefit...or as some apparently do....gameboys and video monitors...and....(sigh) writing Op/Ed's to the local papers. Sheesh...
                      "96% of all Internet Quotes are suspect and the remaining 4% are fiction."
                      ~~Abraham Lincoln~~

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by bushrat View Post
                        In a discussion on the fisheries mgmt forum a member here called Jim Rearden an "anti":


                        This opinion above stemmed from this op-ed by Jim Rearden:
                        http://www.adn.com/2011/04/21/v-prin...etter-bet.html

                        We can agree or disagree on numerous issues related to hunting and fishing and development. But it takes the cake really when some use the "Anti" label (and go even farther to denigrate someone) on a fellow hunter and longtime Alaskan just because they don't agree with him.

                        So what say you all, is Jim Rearden what the AOD member quoted above says he is because he penned that op-ed?
                        br,
                        Is this about Rearden or the 'Res???
                        "96% of all Internet Quotes are suspect and the remaining 4% are fiction."
                        ~~Abraham Lincoln~~

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by sayak View Post
                          I have known Jim Rearden for years. I once took an extended trip up the Wood River Lakes system with him. He is not an "anti", he just has strong opinions. Just like other old time Alaskans, who are in the know about wildlife issues, are on both sides of the bear baiting controversy.
                          I think the word ANTI is used without understanding what is being attached to the prefix. ANTI-what? ANTI-hunting? ANTI-natural resource development? ANTI-Texas ...

                          I think Jim Rearden is ANTI-something ... but not ANTI-hunter

                          Having said that, I don't necessarily agree with what Jim says in the article. I am ANTI-greenie, ANTI-peta (animal rights activist) ... I don't think it's fair that my dog is more comfortable than me when we fly on a plane. The last time I checked, God gave man dominion over the earth. I am a strong believer in conservation (wise use) not preservation (no use).

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Truenorthed View Post
                            I think Jim Rearden is ANTI-something ... but not ANTI-hunter
                            Dang it all...Don't go trying to put it back into the original context as previously presented...you sir are gong to ruin the bushrat's fun.
                            Of Course he is Anti-Development...anyone who has read his works can easily assess where he stood....
                            An Anti....means something different to each of us...
                            "96% of all Internet Quotes are suspect and the remaining 4% are fiction."
                            ~~Abraham Lincoln~~

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Akres View Post
                              Dang it all...Don't go trying to put it back into the original context as previously presented...you sir are gong to ruin the bushrat's fun.
                              Of Course he is Anti-Development...anyone who has read his works can easily assess where he stood....
                              An Anti....means something different to each of us...
                              Another disgruntled member of the older establishment, that writes in a manner acceptable to a piece of trash paper. Slanted is as Slanted does; Ever notice the kind of articles written there? pure JUNK 99.99% of them.
                              squab (probably of Scandinavian descent; skvabb, meaning "loose, fat flesh") is a young domestic pigeon or its meat

                              Comment

                              Footer Adsense

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X