There have been quite a few threads dedicated to the issues surrounding hunting the Dalton Highway--access, pulloffs and conflicts to name a few.
Considering its sheer size and relative paucity of infrastructure, Alaska charges nominal fees to hunt and fish, whereas most other states charge set-aside fees for access to certain areas in addition to license and tag fees.
Im curious to know how people would feel if there was a fee charged for traveling north of the Yukon bridge on the condition that those funds were earmarked to improvements for things like more pull outs in the vicinity of the main migration routes, more or widened places to camp, outhouses & trash barrels and maybe a public phone or two.
Considering its sheer size and relative paucity of infrastructure, Alaska charges nominal fees to hunt and fish, whereas most other states charge set-aside fees for access to certain areas in addition to license and tag fees.
Im curious to know how people would feel if there was a fee charged for traveling north of the Yukon bridge on the condition that those funds were earmarked to improvements for things like more pull outs in the vicinity of the main migration routes, more or widened places to camp, outhouses & trash barrels and maybe a public phone or two.
Comment