Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If you were gunna.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • If you were gunna.....

    I have a 17' Grumman sq back and a variety of motors to put on the back, a 16' Penobscot and 5 others.

    My issue now is my wife is interested in canoes and she is not "canoe friendly"...meaning she tends to fall out of the canoe when boarding and getting out. So far, she has been a good sport about it even thought it must be embarrassing to her. Choices...get a new wife who is a "canoe person" or perhaps find a very stable canoe that she will be comfortable riding in. She likes canoeing once she gets settled in the seat. Considering that I have 27 years invested in this wife and she owns half of my worldly goods and I like her a lot, I convinced myself to look for a more stable canoe.

    The two choices I came up with are the Esquif Cargo (17' x 44") made of 3 ply royalex and the Osagian Missourian (17' x 44") made of 0.050" aluminum. Both seem to be fine canoes and the Missourian has side sponsons to add to secondary stability. There is an Esquif dealer 80 miles from me who will take in some of my other canoes on trade and the nearest dealer for the Missourian is 700 miles so that means shipping if I go that route and selling my canoes on-line.

    Questions:
    1. If anyone has any experiance with these canoes, please comment on the primary and secondary stability of these two boats and how you like them in general.

    2. I will replace the Grumman 17' with which ever I buy so the durability of the canoe is also in question. I lean towards the aluminum boat. Which one is best for river/stream and lake travels, deer and elk hunts and fly fishing in ID, MT, WY, OR and WA? I will also keep my 12' Ultimate for small places and solo trips.

    3. I have a 3.3 Merc, some 5 hp Johnson/Evinrudes, a 6 hp Evinrude and a 15 hp Evinrude....all 2 strokes. I plan to sell off these motors (except the 3.3 Merc) and get one 4 stroke in the 6 - 8 hp range. Which engine would you choose for the canoe of your choice?

    Thanks in advance!!

    Joe
    Somewhere along the way I have lost the ability to act politically correct. If you should find it, please feel free to keep it.

  • #2
    So...apparently no one has heard of these canoes so I've chosen the Missourian to replace the Grumman. Looks like a great boat and after talking to Jared at Osagian today he is going to drop it off at my door for a nominal fee. I also talked to the Esquif dealer as well and I just felt more comfortable with the aluminum canoe. So there you have it...looks like my old 7.5 hp sears motor gets the first chance to push the new boat and after a clean up the Johnson 6 hp will get a chance. Can't wait for next week when Osagian drops off my new canoe.
    Somewhere along the way I have lost the ability to act politically correct. If you should find it, please feel free to keep it.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Lowrider View Post
      So...apparently no one has heard of these canoes so I've chosen the Missourian to replace the Grumman. Looks like a great boat and after talking to Jared at Osagian today he is going to drop it off at my door for a nominal fee. I also talked to the Esquif dealer as well and I just felt more comfortable with the aluminum canoe. So there you have it...looks like my old 7.5 hp sears motor gets the first chance to push the new boat and after a clean up the Johnson 6 hp will get a chance. Can't wait for next week when Osagian drops off my new canoe.
      Don't get ur panties in too much of a bunch, I've looked them both over, they are both very nice. I chose the royalex esquif because of the shallow rivers I run. type in the canoe on the search engine.....there is a TON of advice.
      www.freightercanoes.com www.copperheadalaska.com
      sigpic
      matnaggewinu

      Comment


      • #4
        It does feel a little tight.

        I did the search before I posted and hoped for more current info specifically focused on the stability issues, otherwise the Grumman is a fine boat and serves me well. The Missourian seems to fit my needs better while keeping my wife in the boat. Thanks for the sanity check.
        Somewhere along the way I have lost the ability to act politically correct. If you should find it, please feel free to keep it.

        Comment


        • #5
          I recently went through the same decision and came to the opposite conclusion. The workmanship on the Osagian was horrible. The bottom was flat(just like your grumman) but is a few inches wider....good initial stability but poor secondary....I do know people who like the Osagian....I'm just not one of them...I'm buying the Esquif Cargo ( already put money down for a May delivery).....

          Comment


          • #6
            .050 is awful thin for me to be comfortable loading a moose and camp and dragging over riffles. I'd be sure to carry a can of MAPP gas and some aluminum brazing rods.

            Comment


            • #7
              the grumman you have has a "T" keel, made out of 1 inch high strip down the center of the canoe an it help to be stable the canoe more than you think it helps, look for a 19 FT. grumman or go for the larger 20 + ft canoes

              Comment


              • #8
                Mainer likes a roundy bottom though

                Think flat bottom Scott. Stable as the day is long.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Now we're geting some where!

                  I thought long and hard about the Albany but I want to haul the canoe on my roof rack on my truck and it is just too heavy for that mode. That's how I got to the Missourian and Esquif Cargo. I'm sorry to hear about poor workmanship on the Osagians, but that is what I'm looking for to help with a decision. I have not seen either in person so that is why I'm going to rely on the personal experience of you folks.

                  The Cargo does look like a better boat but I was really looking for a more stable canoe and it seemed like the slick bottom on the esquif was not going to give me that solid feeling. I haven't been dumped out of a canoe in many years but my wife has not been so fortunate. Looks like I need to get off the web and go look and feel these boats before I make a decision.

                  Thanks for the comments!!
                  Somewhere along the way I have lost the ability to act politically correct. If you should find it, please feel free to keep it.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I have a 17' Missourian. The workmanship looks fine. Yes - you can car top it but it requies two people to load and unload. Its a big canoe on top of car or full size truck. I made a utility trailer 5'x12' with a 6' tongue and put on removeable rubber rollers to tote the canoe around. This gives me extra room for gas, kicker, etc...

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      The osagian I looked at is on the rack at Sportsman warehouse....I would not buy it. I have done a fair amount of aluminum work over the years (aircraft), bending/forming, riveting and TIG welding....I do have an eye for what is acceptable standards in aluminum work for both strength and aesthetics....that boat does not meet my standards.....
                      The Esquif is an unknown quantity to me...I do have a canoe that has similar lines, but is a double ender...the Esquif looks like it will be very stable...I will be in rivers quite often, so I do not want a flat bottom/keel type boat....I need maneuverability....To each his own, my two cents worth.....

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by pipercub View Post
                        The osagian I looked at is on the rack at Sportsman warehouse....I would not buy it. I have done a fair amount of aluminum work over the years (aircraft), bending/forming, riveting and TIG welding....I do have an eye for what is acceptable standards in aluminum work for both strength and aesthetics....that boat does not meet my standards.....
                        The Esquif is an unknown quantity to me...I do have a canoe that has similar lines, but is a double ender...the Esquif looks like it will be very stable...I will be in rivers quite often, so I do not want a flat bottom/keel type boat....I need maneuverability....To each his own, my two cents worth.....

                        The flat bottom doesn't matter about manageability with a motor, but if your motor went down and you had to paddle......not so good. I'll have to reinforce the transom of my esquif cargo for the copperhead 12 motor I have, but will also be paddling the canoe with the motor slightly lifted too, and I agree......the esquif is one heck of a versatile canoe.
                        www.freightercanoes.com www.copperheadalaska.com
                        sigpic
                        matnaggewinu

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Well, the Missourian is on hold and I'm off tomorrow to look at an Esquif Cargo which I guess is the way I'm leaning now. A friend of mine reminded me of being dumped when his Grumman got stuck on a rock and he went sideways. I guess that thought is turning me back to the smooth bottom Cargo.

                          I'm not an A&P but have built an RV-4 and done lots of work on Cessnas when I was flying in Homer and I would hate to get an aluminum boat that had poor workmanship in it that I had to look at everytime I went out in it....just a thought.
                          Somewhere along the way I have lost the ability to act politically correct. If you should find it, please feel free to keep it.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Yeah, a friend lost a Grumman 19 by wrapping it around a boulder after catching a keel.....I would have to disagree about how manuverable some boats are under power....some hulls can be leaned a bit to initiate a turn....some are like trying to steer a barge upriver....I know a guy who has spent two summers on big Alaskan rivers driving an Osagian, with a 15hp Honda and has been pleased with its performance......So I'm not trying to bash them here....For all I know, Sportsman's may buy factory 2nds and sell them as first quality.....who knows......anyway right or wrong, I'm going with the Esquif Cargo....And in the for what it's worth department, you should always be prepared to paddle any river that you are motoring up.....IMHO

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              canoes

                              a lot of people have put there 2 CTS. there is a lot of good an some bad ,info there , Like the 19 that got folded an that will happen no mater what canoe you have, the 20 + ft canoes are great on large water but it will kill you on small water draft , an heavy, a lot heaver than the 19 grumman you can carry it not far but some, [have dun it] an you cab drag it without to much effot, there is no single canoe that can do it, if there was we would all have one, in stead of the ones we do have , as I am a a 19 ft grumman man, it is one of the best on the water, the only problem is it is not a large water canoe [waves]

                              Comment

                              Footer Adsense

                              Collapse
                              Working...
                              X