In a discussion on the fisheries mgmt forum a member here called Jim Rearden an "anti":
This opinion above stemmed from this op-ed by Jim Rearden:Originally Posted by Akres
We can agree or disagree on numerous issues related to hunting and fishing and development. But it takes the cake really when some use the "Anti" label (and go even farther to denigrate someone) on a fellow hunter and longtime Alaskan just because they don't agree with him.
So what say you all, is Jim Rearden what the AOD member quoted above says he is because he penned that op-ed?