Looking for studied and/or knowledgeable opinions: I want a battle rifle. I don't want a .223 or 5.56mm. I really like the PTR-91, but the FAL feels better in my hands. Alternatively, I could by a CETME and 5000 rounds of ammo for less than just the PTR or FAL...
I've used the M-4 in enough situations to develop strong (very, very strong) opinions on it's usefulness (or lack thereof) in a tactical environment but I don't have any first-hand experience with the 7.62mm in anything other than the M-60 and M-249.
I know Ken and Murphy agree to disagree on the M1A vs. the FAL, but I couldn't find anything comparing the three guns I'm trying to decide between. So...let me know what you think, why you think it, and if you've got another option (AR-10?) feel free to throw it out for discussion.