It seems like the issues involving non-residents and our states F&G budget go hand in hand. Sometimes even seems that the state is catering to non-residents to some degree. It would only make sense since most of F&Gs' finances come from non-resident licenses and tags. So my question is would we the resident hunters of Alaska be willing to pay for our tags to aid in F&G actually having some money to be able to do their job better and break their reliance on the non-res money. That is assuming in a perfect world that the money will actually be put to good use. I for one absolutely would be willing to pay for all my tags, I have long thought it was silly we dont.