in the november proposal book i see two proposals addressing the wounding of bears and whether or not a wounded bear should apply to a hunters bag limit.
in proposal 9 the argument FOR having a wounded bear count against the bag limit is put forth...and i agree with it...HOWEVER it is only specific to unit 5.
in proposal 11 the opposite argument is made for units 1-4.
*** ? ....how can there be a difference? if a wounded bear counts, and i believe it should (and anything else, for that matter), why in one unit but not another.
yes, this is, unfortunately, the state legislating ethics, which we as hunters <should> be able to take care of ourselves.
as to unenforcable, it isn't any more or less enforcable than most other regs, as unless a trooper actually witnesses a violation it is hard for them to write a ticket that sticks...but we all have cell phones and radios, and know how to use them when we witness violations...