Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 50

Thread: Tundra Dummies!!! "THE END RESULT"

  1. #1

    Default Tundra Dummies!!! "THE END RESULT"


  2. #2

    Default $10,000 fine?

    so was that fine $10,000 each or did they each get $2,500 in fines?

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Pole
    Posts
    424

    Default Standard

    That is a pretty expensive caribou hunt. I still like the idea that someone had when this all started and they should of held them to the same standrad they hold anyone to when they shoot a bou or any other animal in Alaska. They should of quartered their vehicles up and carried them back to the road. I would like to attend one of their outreach programs to hear what they have to say...

  4. #4

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bowtechshooter View Post
    That is a pretty expensive caribou hunt. I still like the idea that someone had when this all started and they should of held them to the same standrad they hold anyone to when they shoot a bou or any other animal in Alaska. They should of quartered their vehicles up and carried them back to the road. I would like to attend one of their outreach programs to hear what they have to say...
    Perhaps some of the active duty military forum participants can attend one and relate back to the rest of us about it's effectiveness.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    North Pole
    Posts
    424

    Default

    If thats a hit on all the military than I take it to heart because I am one of the active duty military members. There are plenty of hunters that are not in the military that do just as stupid if not more things out there so dont hold everything against the military.

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    FAI
    Posts
    2,294

    Default No black eye for the military

    It did not sound to me like Akres was pointing the finger. The article talked about part of the restitution being that the trespassers have to teach outreach for new military personnel. That outreach should be open to the public as it was on public land, but doubt that will ever happen. So I agree, it would be interesting to get feedback from a military forum member on what those involved have to say.
    I also find it incongruous that a crime was committed yet the names are protected. Just does not sound like a fair playing field to me. Too bad for them if their names get published and they have to weather some ridicule and chastising. Personally I hope the News Miner gets the names via the freedom of information act. Hopefully someday we can get the whole story.

  7. #7
    Member duckslayer56's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Maryland...not by choice
    Posts
    2,058

    Default Why

    Who cares about the names. They paid thier fines, got the trucks and caribou out, and I am sure have suffered enough ridicule and chastisement. This thing happened over a year ago, and we are still beating this dead horse. Why don't we move on and talk about hunting, not a mistake that they were not the first to make, and I am sure won't be the last.

  8. #8
    Member moose-head's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    @ Seminary, Dubuque Ia
    Posts
    839

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ak River Rat View Post
    I also find it incongruous that a crime was committed yet the names are protected. Just does not sound like a fair playing field to me. Too bad for them if their names get published and they have to weather some ridicule and chastising. Personally I hope the News Miner gets the names via the freedom of information act. Hopefully someday we can get the whole story.
    Let's not forget who the real bad guys are

    "If you look at the blogs that have been online about this, some folks would like to publicly humiliate these folks and one way to do that is release their names,”
    after all they were required to pay $2500 each (+ $175 for the vehicle owners). and distribute information to military personnel on bases in Alaska about “Leave No Trace” and “Tread Lightly,” For gosh sakes haven't they been through enough

  9. #9

    Default

    I agree, leave them alone, they paid the price for their mistake. Find someone else to bash.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Anchorage
    Posts
    1,956

    Default

    "after all they were required to pay $2500 each (+ $175 for the vehicle owners). and distribute information to military personnel on bases in Alaska about “Leave No Trace” and “Tread Lightly,” For gosh sakes haven't they been through enough"

    And that didn't include the approximate $32,000 it cost them to get the vehicles out and running again. Then there spouses will NEVER let them live it down. "We" may not know their names but everyone in their squadron does and they have no doubt received enough harassment. Just let it die.

  11. #11

    Thumbs down Here we go AGAIN!!!!!

    And just when I thought everyone got they're fill of this a year ago! Here we go again..... Thanks Alaska Cub!...BLah BLah BLah BLah BLah. If you care,It's in the paper, read it there! No sense in putting the forum in a tailspin once again!
    Be safe, and enjoy your time outdoors!
    Mountain Man

    "I'm not here for a long time! I'm here for a good time!!!!!!!!!!!"

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bowtechshooter View Post
    If thats a hit on all the military than I take it to heart because I am one of the active duty military members. There are plenty of hunters that are not in the military that do just as stupid if not more things out there so dont hold everything against the military.
    Not at all, but I do think it is worthy of public scrutiny, for others to judge the effectiveness of punishment for crimes. How else would we as a society need to continue or modify our standards we impose on one another? The outreach programs could even be taped and aired by BLM, DNR and ADFG on their web sites, for all to see. To me that would not be unreasonable and probably way more effective than attempting to reach only a few active duty military personnel for a very short period of time, while they are stationed here. When they PCS, the outreach program goes down the tube. How effective can that possibly be? It is yet another LIBERAL MINDED form of how our beauracratic government works. It will all go away soon, as it is what they wanted in the first place.

  13. #13
    Forum Admin Brian M's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Eagle River, AK
    Posts
    13,391

    Default

    For those who think the names should not be released, would you also support not releasing the names of others who violate F&G laws? The Trooper reports are full of people's names every day who are simply accused of breaking the law, even if they are later aquited of the offense. I fail to see why these fellas should be treated differently. 99% of all offenders have their names in the public record for all to see. Only juvenile offenders have their names protected under our laws. Either change the law and protect everyone, or apply the same standard that is applied to the rest of the population and release the names.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian M View Post
    For those who think the names should not be released, would you also support not releasing the names of others who violate F&G laws? The Trooper reports are full of people's names every day who are simply accused of breaking the law, even if they are later aquited of the offense. I fail to see why these fellas should be treated differently. 99% of all offenders have their names in the public record for all to see. Only juvenile offenders have their names protected under our laws. Either change the law and protect everyone, or apply the same standard that is applied to the rest of the population and release the names.

    Absolutely agree! Not that I really give a **** who they are, what provides them with privacy that others arent afforded. Heck I got a ticket a couple years ago for folding up a cardboard box and putting it in a campfire pit at one of the camping spots on Coal Mine Rd. The state didn't have any problem putting my name in the police blotter in the paper and I caught all kinds of **** from my buds over it. So the whole public secrecy thing is really BS.

    As to why bring this up.......its in the GD newspaper and was a topic of discussion forever here and no one ever knew what their actual final punishment was. As to the $32,000 they spent in recovery fees, I'm gonna go out on a limb and say those fees are highly exagerated cuz I am doubting very highly that a few Air Force airmen could **** $32,000 CASH. Anyway its over and thats the final word from the newspapers, and inquiring minds have wanted to know!
    Last edited by Brian M; 12-07-2007 at 13:49.

  15. #15
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Fairbanks Alaska
    Posts
    63

    Default punishment

    I think we can all agree that what these knuckleheads did was inexcusable. However after reading a lot of this thread I think that a lot of you are only considering part of their punishment. If you think for one minute that these guys only punishment was to pay a $10,000 fine, $27,000 for vehicle recovery and repair, and $175.00 each for the drivers, and community outreach to other military members about the Tread Lightly program you are mistaken. Being a military member myself for 23 years I know that the worst punishment will come from the military itself, and you will never hear about it. You'll never hear that this could end the careers of these Airmen, that they can and probably will be punished under the articles of the UCMJ, that they can be fined by the military itself for behavior unbecomming an Airman. How many of you would lose your job over something like this, how many of you would be fined by someone other than the state? I can also guarantee that even after they PCS this topic will not dye in Alaska. It will become a part of every persons in processing briefings. This is a black eye for the Air Force in Alaska and every effort will be made not to repeat anything like this again in the future. I can only imagine how pi**ed the Commanding General at Elmendorf is!

  16. #16
    Member MNViking's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    746

    Default

    I'd wager that their careers were severely damaged if not ended. I'd assume they get 3's on their performance reports which would ,conservatively, set them back about two years for promotion. Figuring about $200 base pay increase per month, again conservatively and not including the increased housing allowance and cost of living allowance, that's another $4800. It's possible that they were demoted so that's another $4800 assuming two years to get back to where they were. There is also a chance they forfeited a percentage of their pay for a few months. Put in base restriction, additional duty, no chance at a decoration (helps with promotion), and being blacklisted from the good TDY's, they could have taken a beating. The 3 performance report these days pretty much ensures they will be unable to reenlist if they are first term airmen. So, it is possible that one mistake could end their career.

    It is likely that this could have cost them well over $10,000 in lost pay on top of their other fines, and ended any aspirations at a career in the Air Force.

    FYI this is the usual punishment for a DUI/DWI except a demotion is guaranteed

  17. #17
    New member akhunter02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    682

    Default its all

    speculation, for all anyone really knows all they received was a LOR.

    I dont care one way or the other, I dont care if the names every get released, the only thing that bothers me is that they are being treated differently than anyone else. Look how many make the paper that are just being accused of something, have not been proven or pleaded guility?. If I was stopped and ticketed for peeing along a remote road you can bet my name would be in the local paper.

  18. #18

    Default

    And what does knowing their names have to do with anything?? You don't think they are getting punished enough? I don't care who they are, I only care that they made a huge error in judgement and are now paying for that error. I don't see the big deal in AlaskaCub posting this info either but the whining about their names not being published is ridiculous. Winter's not even half over people, try and find something a little more productive to talk about.

  19. #19
    Member ak_powder_monkey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Eagle River/ Juneau
    Posts
    5,154

    Default

    so did they salvage edible meat of the bou they shot? If not they should be fined for that as well, their names should be of the public record...
    I choose to fly fish, not because its easy, but because its hard.

  20. #20
    Member fullkurl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Alaska/Idaho
    Posts
    2,162

    Thumbs down Question of fairness?

    I personally can care less who these guys are (and I've pushed for less vitriol throughout these many posts (threads?))

    That said, it seems to me that their names should be public knowledge. It's wrong that most get identity disclosure and these guys don't.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •