Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Colt

  1. #1
    Supporting Member Amigo Will's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Wrangell
    Posts
    7,600
    Now left only to be a turd in the forrest and the circle will be complete.Use me as I have used you

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wasilla
    Posts
    515

    Default

    I do not know but would not trade my lightweight commander in 38 supper for a glock or berretta. Just my nickles wort

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Bakerton, WV
    Posts
    467

    Default

    Colt never kept up with the consumer market with stronger and better guns for hunting, etc. They relied on gov contracts and is what did them in long ago. Even when the .44 mag came out they hung back and when they made one it was not worth the money. Guns cost more then anyone wanted to pay. Who would buy a Colt when a $96 Ruger was better. They made some good guns but none stood the test of time. Ruger ONLY loads meant a lot, never to be used in a Colt.
    Colt long ago held patients that ruined many gun makers with better guns. They got patient extensions. But once time did them in, they lost.
    Poor management and guns that should have been made better. Ruger thought about the public and did not care about the gov. Colt wanted big contracts and never thought about the common man.

  4. #4
    Member S.B.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Central Illinois
    Posts
    680

    Default

    Well, now I hope all American, foreign gun owners are happy.
    Steve

  5. #5
    Member hogfamily's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Anchorage Suburbanites, part time Willowbillies, Appleseeds, and Weekend Warrior Turquoise Miners!
    Posts
    1,094

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •